Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Cosby - Count is up to 16 [View all]pnwmom
(110,301 posts)57. Those women were all caught up in a political campaign, which puts their credibility at question.
Most of the Cosby accusers have only come out now when there is no chance of financial or other gain.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
119 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I'm sure she just wants a quick payout, after all, she is of questionable moral character.
Happyhippychick
Nov 2014
#1
One woman might make a false allegation against a famous person. But 16???
nomorenomore08
Nov 2014
#117
I just thought he was an out-of-touch old rich guy, assuming others were equally unaffected
nomorenomore08
Nov 2014
#118
These women have nothing to gain and they're not pushing a political point of view. n/t
pnwmom
Nov 2014
#43
Did you believe all the women who accused Clinton of rape? Bring it court, present evidence, then
sabrina 1
Nov 2014
#7
No there wasn't just one woman. But you didn't say if you believed that one woman? Why should it
sabrina 1
Nov 2014
#18
You don't remember Juanita Broderick, the rape accuser, Kathleen Wiley, Paula Jones who settled out
sabrina 1
Nov 2014
#41
Who needs trials and juries and evidence? And what 'testimony' are we going to hear? Will it be
sabrina 1
Nov 2014
#56
Those women were all caught up in a political campaign, which puts their credibility at question.
pnwmom
Nov 2014
#57
Thankfully we don't convict people on gut feelings, well at least not formally. There were plenty
sabrina 1
Nov 2014
#76
you're suggesting women who were drugged and rape "handle it". Gotcha. No thanks.
bettyellen
Nov 2014
#80
And there it is, my point clearly made. Thank you. Let's do a little experiment here.
sabrina 1
Nov 2014
#85
if you were not equating drugging and raping someone with "boorish behavior" then why the heck did
bettyellen
Nov 2014
#88
My point made even more strongly: 'Inference' V 'facts' is all that is required to convict someone.
sabrina 1
Nov 2014
#89
so your post about "boorish behavior" had nothing to do with Cosby rape allegations? LOL
bettyellen
Nov 2014
#90
Thank you for your assistance in my little experiment. Avoid, distract, do anything, but do not
sabrina 1
Nov 2014
#91
yes- refusing to explain that nonsense you posted about "boorish behavior" is avoiding,
bettyellen
Nov 2014
#92
I see you are making excuses for not believing those women. Broderick accused Clinton of rape
sabrina 1
Nov 2014
#95
Did you believe her? I saw all this long ago and did not believe her regardless of those
sabrina 1
Nov 2014
#103
Have any of these women been placed under oath yet? The core issue is the same. You provided me
sabrina 1
Nov 2014
#106
Geez, guess your kids or friends are shit out of luck for moral support
freeplessinseattle
Nov 2014
#37
Exactly what do you mean by that? Do you know any of the people involved in this? I don't. I don't
sabrina 1
Nov 2014
#40
If you go to the police, they would be more supportive and realistic
freeplessinseattle
Nov 2014
#42
He absolutely was accused of rape, by a woman named Juanita Broderick eg. Thirty years earlier.
sabrina 1
Nov 2014
#35
The courts held that George Zimmerman is NOT GUILTY. Do you believe that's the definitive word,
pnwmom
Nov 2014
#45
And just because you are willing to convict someone without a shred of evidence you don't get to
sabrina 1
Nov 2014
#48
Did you believe Paula Jones, Kathleen Wiley who was a Democrat and had no political motive
sabrina 1
Nov 2014
#58
Paula Jones didn't claim she was raped, did she? Or claim Clinton gave her drugs?
pnwmom
Nov 2014
#62
I never said other people "have no right to wait for something other than mere allegations."
pnwmom
Nov 2014
#55
Why would a woman who was sexually assaulted settle out of court, presumably for money? If I
sabrina 1
Nov 2014
#36
Not every woman is you either. Some prefer justice to money. And any prosecutor who 'believes' a
sabrina 1
Nov 2014
#50
They don't go to trial based on 'belief' because they know that their 'belief' will be
sabrina 1
Nov 2014
#59
And by her measure, drugging and raping is somehow related to "boorish behavior" a person should
bettyellen
Nov 2014
#114
Prosecutions are never easy. Justice isn't always guaranteed. I know that from
sabrina 1
Nov 2014
#53
Did you believe Juanita Broderick's rape allegations from decades ago against Clinton?
sabrina 1
Nov 2014
#75
I'm not talking about anything to do with Clinton, I'm referring to one of Cosby's victims
davidpdx
Nov 2014
#109
Can you provide something that substantiates this allegation? Some evidence? What I have seen so
sabrina 1
Nov 2014
#110
Sadly if most of his victims were African American, this story would probably have no traction
Happyhippychick
Nov 2014
#13
I don't think any of them, regardless of their race, should be let off easy.
Jamastiene
Nov 2014
#64
No shit! I mean, COME ON... how many victims does it take before people cut the BULLSHIT?
CrawlingChaos
Nov 2014
#116
The name Clinton has been associated with rape 11 times by one individual in this thread.
NCTraveler
Nov 2014
#79
the point was, as always, that it is a man's world and women are here just to keep it sweet
bettyellen
Nov 2014
#84
I wish they all would've come out sooner and pressed charges so there could've been a trial instead
craigmatic
Nov 2014
#81
likely there was no useful physical evidence- any drugs or semen could be explained away
bettyellen
Nov 2014
#87
Bill Cosby, for a significant amount of time, was the most powerful entertainer in Hollywood.
Maedhros
Nov 2014
#108
Right. But is there any official, written record of allegations before the 2004 suit?
Tommy_Carcetti
Nov 2014
#101
Not saying he's innocent. Also, not forgetting how celebrities are easy targets.
lindysalsagal
Nov 2014
#113