Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Secretary Hagel resigning today. [View all]xiamiam
(4,906 posts)36. probably directly related to the news this am from democracy now
http://www.democracynow.org/2014/11/24/after_vowing_to_end_combat_mission
snip
President Obama has secretly extended the U.S. role in Afghanistan despite earlier promises to wind down Americas longest war. According to the New York Times, Obama has signed a classified order that ensures U.S. troops will have a direct role in fighting. In addition, the order reportedly enables American jets, bombers and drones to bolster Afghan troops on combat missions. And, under certain circumstances, it would apparently authorize U.S. air-strikes to support Afghan military operations throughout the country. The decision contradicts Obamas earlier announcement that the U.S. military would have no combat role in Afghanistan next year. Afghanistans new president Ashraf Ghani has also backed an expanded U.S. military role. Ghani, who took office in September, has also reportedly lifted limits on U.S. airstrikes and joint raids that his predecessor Hamid Karzai had put in place. We go to Kabul to speak with Dr. Hakim, a peace activist and physician who has provided humanitarian relief in Afghanistan for the last decade. We are also joined by Kathy Kelly of Voices for Creative Nonviolence, who has just returned from Afghanistan.
snip
President Obama has secretly extended the U.S. role in Afghanistan despite earlier promises to wind down Americas longest war. According to the New York Times, Obama has signed a classified order that ensures U.S. troops will have a direct role in fighting. In addition, the order reportedly enables American jets, bombers and drones to bolster Afghan troops on combat missions. And, under certain circumstances, it would apparently authorize U.S. air-strikes to support Afghan military operations throughout the country. The decision contradicts Obamas earlier announcement that the U.S. military would have no combat role in Afghanistan next year. Afghanistans new president Ashraf Ghani has also backed an expanded U.S. military role. Ghani, who took office in September, has also reportedly lifted limits on U.S. airstrikes and joint raids that his predecessor Hamid Karzai had put in place. We go to Kabul to speak with Dr. Hakim, a peace activist and physician who has provided humanitarian relief in Afghanistan for the last decade. We are also joined by Kathy Kelly of Voices for Creative Nonviolence, who has just returned from Afghanistan.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
59 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Why? Hagel was probably the most reluctant to go to war among the whole national security team.
Mass
Nov 2014
#4
It's odd that he has that reputation when he voted Yes on every war he was ever asked to fund
Bluenorthwest
Nov 2014
#18
CNN reported WH told them that about Hagel staying on until replacement is confirmed
pinboy3niner
Nov 2014
#16
Holder, now Hagel. Shouldn't they have replacements already in mind before they announce?
Nuclear Unicorn
Nov 2014
#30
I don't get it. Obama has two months to name someone before Republicans take over and
merrily
Nov 2014
#46
I see. In this case, Obama has somebody he needs to fire in the WH. I do not know who gave
Mass
Nov 2014
#35
I suspect that Hagel was very against extending the war against ISIS. And he may have made it
jwirr
Nov 2014
#41
I worry too. I worry mostly because the White House is ridiculously busy humiliating him,
Mass
Nov 2014
#13
from 1995? Hagel served in the military from 1967-68 and as Secretary of Defense from 2013.
merrily
Nov 2014
#27
Okay, thank you for the definition. Obama had better think about who he puts in. Maybe someone
jwirr
Nov 2014
#59
Problems don't appear any more to be dem or repub. It's more like neocon and wall street parties
TheNutcracker
Nov 2014
#43