Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Hillary Clinton Leads in New Hampshire by Historic Margin [View all]Cosmic Kitten
(3,498 posts)71. That's the right idea.
Polling companies are in BUSINESS to MAKE MONEY.
I'm sure Purple Insights hope to get into Hillary's
campaign spending stream for 2016.
If they released more demographic info
it could de-legitimize their polling sample.
Hence, their reluctance to be transparent.
Better to pander to Hillary and curry favor.
BTW, Hillary's BIG primary lead is based
on the responses of....246 people
404 democratic voters with 61% preferring Hillary.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
115 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Neither was Illiniois. Neither is any state that elects a Governor or US Senator. And?
merrily
Nov 2014
#8
She won on name recognition in an imaginary race. Let's not even bother w primaries!! ~nt
RiverLover
Nov 2014
#2
Polls this far out are useless. For example, Hillary's numbers are lower than they were a year ago.
merrily
Nov 2014
#6
This far out, polls are pure bullshit. More an attempt to shape public opinion than to measure it.
merrily
Nov 2014
#51
Please don't get so defensive. I'd love to see Sanders elected, but I don't ignore the obstacles.
Jim Lane
Nov 2014
#108
LOL: "Clinton runs nearly even with Romney in a head-to-head match-up" (para 4)
Proud Public Servant
Nov 2014
#20
And not leading "in the primary," since she's not running and there is no primary.
Orsino
Nov 2014
#27
More facts for the weary to chew over and over. Bring on the candidates, the real choices will be
Thinkingabout
Nov 2014
#29
I looked back and see you deserve an apology. I think I answered the wrong post. Very sorry. Will
jwirr
Nov 2014
#64
So anyone in public office can do anything & its ok with you because they are sacrificing to be
RiverLover
Nov 2014
#53
After the 2008 primaries, she should be persona non grata in Democratic circles.
ieoeja
Nov 2014
#74
She leads in NH Democratic primary. Okay who was she running against? I does not say.
jwirr
Nov 2014
#49
Yours is a majority statement. We need an alternative that both sides will want over Bush/Clinton
TheNutcracker
Nov 2014
#62
The next President will likely nominate replacements for the two oldest members of the Supreme Court
Agnosticsherbet
Nov 2014
#81
If he changes parties and runs in the Primary, I intend to suport him.
Agnosticsherbet
Nov 2014
#100
Other than some grumpy people here, where is there a sign that Democrats won't vote for Hillary?
brooklynite
Nov 2014
#91