Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Yes, but generally in the other direction Recursion Nov 2014 #1
Yes, you are 100% correct.Non-Cops get indited. Cops do not. nt Logical Nov 2014 #2
it sounds like he carefully edited what the grand jury heard bettyellen Nov 2014 #4
We don't know, but his claim was that he had every witness who had given a statement testify Recursion Nov 2014 #5
really? I could have sworn he said they ruled out some testimony, hmmm. bettyellen Nov 2014 #9
That's a good question. I don't know whether he means "I didn't find them credible so they didn't Recursion Nov 2014 #11
I was sure he said early on that they did not present every witness. bettyellen Nov 2014 #12
Thanks; I had heard the opposite but that was a while ago Recursion Nov 2014 #13
they said they planned to show all the evidence, so I was shocked to hear that.... bettyellen Nov 2014 #14
I think it was more a case of, "We took a statement from Joe Smith, but we can't find Joe Smith... X_Digger Nov 2014 #21
Or people who don't want to give their real names and addresses to cops Recursion Nov 2014 #23
Could be, just as plausible. n/t X_Digger Nov 2014 #25
Did serve once and Wellstone ruled Nov 2014 #3
Sounds pretty one sided. nt Logical Nov 2014 #6
Depends on the state. A Texas GJ is a whole 'nother ball of wax. X_Digger Nov 2014 #8
Our whole system is rigged and it's been rigged for centuries. Kalidurga Nov 2014 #7
+1 gollygee Nov 2014 #10
In regular jury trials, Jenoch Nov 2014 #15
But the evidence presented is controlled by the State only. Rigged. nt Logical Nov 2014 #17
Who else should present evidence to a grand jury? Jenoch Nov 2014 #18
I would have no problem with Michael Brown's attorney presenting evidence. nt Logical Nov 2014 #19
The state still has to put on the trial davidn3600 Nov 2014 #24
Simple question, could the prosecutor have gotten an indictment if he wanted to? Nt Logical Nov 2014 #27
You do know that prosecutors do not like pissing off the police, correct? Logical Nov 2014 #20
It effectively was Nevernose Nov 2014 #22
Back in the 1800's the victim or his family would present to a grand jury Recursion Nov 2014 #26
St. Louis is not going to be able to live this down. logosoco Nov 2014 #16
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Grand Jury system is ...»Reply #17