Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ctaylors6

(693 posts)
22. I have question about the prosecutor(s)
Tue Nov 25, 2014, 01:44 PM
Nov 2014

I started to post this somewhere else but decided this thread may be better place. I've started reading the transcripts, and McCulloch isn't the one questioning the witnesses; two other people are - Ms. Whirley and Ms. Aliadeh.

After some googling, I found and read this article:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/in-atypical-approach-grand-jury-in-ferguson-shooting-receives-full-measure-of-case/2014/09/07/1dec6ffe-339b-11e4-8f02-03c644b2d7d0_story.html

It says: "McCulloch declined to step aside, but he is not presenting evidence to the grand jury, which usually means he won’t try the case himself, Magee said. But he is supervising the two attorneys in his office — Sheila Whirley and Kathi Alizadeh — who are presenting to the grand jury."

The article is dated 9/7. Does anyone know if Whirley and Alizadeh presented all the evidence or if McCulloch stepped in at some point? I'm not saying it made difference to outcome, but it just surprised me that I hadn't heard about this before today.

Thanks!

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I have been saying all night, that wilson should at least lose his gun rights - he hollysmom Nov 2014 #1
He did a shitload of shooting before killing the unarmed boy. Yes, he did. delrem Nov 2014 #3
I believe they can aint_no_life_nowhere Nov 2014 #2
He can AFAIK Recursion Nov 2014 #4
The feds can open a grand jury now davidn3600 Nov 2014 #5
McCulloch could also choose to forgo the GJ decision justiceischeap Nov 2014 #6
If the first grand jury was presented ALL the facts . ... badtoworse Nov 2014 #7
It might help if you have a Prosecutor that avebury Nov 2014 #9
I didn't get that from the press conference badtoworse Nov 2014 #10
What have you read about McCulloch up to this point? annabanana Nov 2014 #12
A prosecutor sways a grand jury, big-time. lovemydog Nov 2014 #13
"he presented 'all the evidence' rather than only the evidence that might lead to an indictment" badtoworse Nov 2014 #14
A grand jury hearing is not a trial. lovemydog Nov 2014 #15
Given that the facts did not persuade the grand jury to indict on any charge,... badtoworse Nov 2014 #16
Well, you're certainly entitled to your opinion. lovemydog Nov 2014 #18
A Grand Jury's sole responsibility is to decide whether there is probable cause KingCharlemagne Nov 2014 #23
The Proseuctors that were on after his speech avebury Nov 2014 #20
a single autopsy without pictures? 50+ witnesses disregarded? bettyellen Nov 2014 #21
The Governor has already made it pretty clear that he avebury Nov 2014 #8
The Governor has no authority to remove McCullough Lurks Often Nov 2014 #17
He did have the authority to appoint a Special Prosecutor, he faile avebury Nov 2014 #19
They can - but would you really TBF Nov 2014 #11
I have question about the prosecutor(s) ctaylors6 Nov 2014 #22
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why can't they convene a ...»Reply #22