Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Case for support of the Grand Jury decision [View all]noiretextatique
(27,275 posts)74. who said you were a racist?
who here said you were as bad as white people who are racists? are you denying that they exist? i don't know who was on the grand jury, but i do know the entire investigation was NOT either fair or impartial. so, given the evidence they were presented, including wilson's racist dog whistle about brown "looking like a demon" and "grunting" like an animal, i don't blame them for not indicting. and you are WRONG about MLK. he didn't DENY the reality of racism, as you seem to be trying to do, he denounced it. do you really think wilson was looking at the content of mike brown's character when he killed him? or did he see, as he claimed "a grunting demon?"
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
88 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I'm under the impression that for some magical reason, belligerent white folks
Blue_Tires
Nov 2014
#14
Who was 'damaged' in this case, the one WITH the weapon or the one WITHOUT the weapon?
sabrina 1
Nov 2014
#55
Oh, I see... That's new standard? One has to take damage before responding with force?
Oktober
Nov 2014
#66
Oh you are right about one thing, 'this whole event has turned off the logical parts of everyone's
sabrina 1
Nov 2014
#68
I don't fault the grand jury for their verdict, they were given select evidence...
Spazito
Nov 2014
#5
The prosecutor presented a defense case for wilson, the grand jury didn't receive any evidence for..
Spazito
Nov 2014
#28
That's why they needed nine WHITE people. Dollars to donuts, all nine said no indictment.
BlueCaliDem
Nov 2014
#26
That's not what I heard. That said, the GJ in Ferguson doesn't NEED all twelve.
BlueCaliDem
Nov 2014
#58
Link please to where it is stated "the decision by the grand jury was unanimous"..
Spazito
Nov 2014
#76
If I recall correctly, I heard that that grand jury was empaneled before this shooting.
WillowTree
Nov 2014
#65
Why are you promoting whitewashing the Grand Jury and Wilson? Do you agree with their decision?
BlueCaliDem
Nov 2014
#15
That sorry excuse for a prosecutor should have either recused himself or have the Gov remove
BlueCaliDem
Nov 2014
#61
Naivety is not the same as innocence and is not something to be proud of.
Live and Learn
Nov 2014
#46
There is a lot of racial injustice, this case may not have been the one to use as an example
NightWatcher
Nov 2014
#69
Most credible witnesses according to whom? Were the witnesses cross examined?
stevenleser
Nov 2014
#70
It is not up to a GJ to determine which witnesses are "most credible." The GJ, faced with CONFLIC-
WinkyDink
Nov 2014
#78