Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NanceGreggs

(27,835 posts)
67. There are actually situations where ...
Tue Nov 25, 2014, 09:57 PM
Nov 2014

... "thinking of the children" should be an obvious consideration.

Do you have any idea how many children are in the crowd that attend the parade? Do you honestly think that any disruption of the parade will end peacefully? All it takes is one epithet yelled, one fist raised in anger, one push, one shove - and your "peaceful protest" gets ugly. And it doesn't matter who started it; we all know how it ends.

What is the point of disrupting an event that is meant for the enjoyment of little kids in the crowd, and those watching at home? What message do you think you'd be sending, and to whom? Do you think that ruining the event would serve any positive purpose - and, of so, what would that purpose be?

"No child is going to be hurt by a peaceful protest." Famous last words. And peaceful or not, there is nothing to be gained by ANY protest in these circumstances, and so much to potentially be lost.

Leave the kids out of it - and leave their cherished events out of it, as well. There are far more advantageous fields on which to do battle.









Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

A peaceful Sit-In right in the path of the parade. Thousands of protestors. TerrapinFlyer Nov 2014 #1
This will be a first, won't it? If it happens? yuiyoshida Nov 2014 #2
Is it overdue? yallerdawg Nov 2014 #38
In one sense, anything that could stop that would be a good thing. delrem Nov 2014 #3
they wouldn't show it on TV pstokely Nov 2014 #4
Despite what we ... NanceGreggs Nov 2014 #5
Agreed. It would just make those interrupting the parade look like troublemakers. JDPriestly Nov 2014 #6
It would seem by the poll yuiyoshida Nov 2014 #9
Clearly I am not the person to answer your question. JDPriestly Nov 2014 #11
While I agree with your statement: yuiyoshida Nov 2014 #12
You are right. That is all the more reason that we need to work to end it with much more energy and JDPriestly Nov 2014 #13
It should have been done with parents yuiyoshida Nov 2014 #15
Why would it be a good thing? Here's why. Bragi Nov 2014 #64
think of the children. cali Nov 2014 #7
oh, you can guarantee it will remain peaceful? lolz KittyWampus Nov 2014 #41
There are actually situations where ... NanceGreggs Nov 2014 #67
I agree Dorian Gray Nov 2014 #22
Marching bands and other kids go to NY ctaylors6 Nov 2014 #27
I'd rather everyone who wants to do this run for a local government position Recursion Nov 2014 #8
No no no, it's not necessary to wreck a big parade like that. NBachers Nov 2014 #10
News Headlines: branford Nov 2014 #14
I have heard alot about why it should not be done yuiyoshida Nov 2014 #16
Good or bad idea, a poll of just 29 people (as of this post) on a very left leaning branford Nov 2014 #17
Wait... yuiyoshida Nov 2014 #18
I meant everything. branford Nov 2014 #19
I am glad you clarified that... yuiyoshida Nov 2014 #20
NO! that would be like shooting Donald Duck and taking Micky Mouse hostage Douglas Carpenter Nov 2014 #21
No justice! No peace! RandiFan1290 Nov 2014 #23
Please explain why you think yuiyoshida Nov 2014 #24
I have to admit, AsahinaKimi Nov 2014 #25
If you want justice, this is not the way to do it. CBHagman Nov 2014 #26
There should be more disruption everywhere all the time. Warren Stupidity Nov 2014 #28
There are many on here now yuiyoshida Nov 2014 #29
1. it has visibility. Warren Stupidity Nov 2014 #32
The thing about it is.. like this, yuiyoshida Nov 2014 #35
The livestreamers would make sure it went out to the entire nation and world. Whether the KingCharlemagne Nov 2014 #48
Whatever one does, please make it peaceful. bigwillq Nov 2014 #30
That would be monumentally stupid and counterproductive. Nye Bevan Nov 2014 #31
I believe thought goes that its a national yuiyoshida Nov 2014 #33
"They" don't hear us. nc4bo Nov 2014 #34
shut down the bridges again and screw with the trains dembotoz Nov 2014 #36
Yeah! Screw up the lives of ordinary people, including minorities trying to get to work. brooklynite Nov 2014 #39
if the goal is to shut it down access bottlenecks safer dembotoz Nov 2014 #42
Bad. There are a lot of little kids around that day. Renew Deal Nov 2014 #37
NO! This is a big deal for the kids. Disrupt the football games but not this. jillan Nov 2014 #40
Horrible idea! hrmjustin Nov 2014 #43
And yet it may happen. yuiyoshida Nov 2014 #44
It will not go over well here if there is a disruption. hrmjustin Nov 2014 #45
The posting results so far agree with you yuiyoshida Nov 2014 #46
Well we are going to have very bad weather here so that might effect the parade anyway. hrmjustin Nov 2014 #49
Who is "they?" (And let's note that it's not possible.) HuckleB Nov 2014 #47
Who is "They" yuiyoshida Nov 2014 #50
Sounds like something said in a state of fight or flight. HuckleB Nov 2014 #51
And yet, both bridges going into yuiyoshida Nov 2014 #52
in milwaukee we had a civil rights activist named mike mcgee dembotoz Nov 2014 #55
Blocking a bridge is not that difficult, really. HuckleB Nov 2014 #57
I don't think so yuiyoshida Nov 2014 #59
How are they going to get into the street? HuckleB Nov 2014 #60
Thats silly... first of all yuiyoshida Nov 2014 #61
Individuals cross the street. HuckleB Nov 2014 #62
WOW...REALLY?? yuiyoshida Nov 2014 #63
I think you Dorian Gray Nov 2014 #54
I would think it is a dumb thing. Xyzse Nov 2014 #53
Wallmart Thanksgiving Parade... L0oniX Nov 2014 #56
I am very mixed on this. dilby Nov 2014 #58
A "bad" but necessary "thing." 99Forever Nov 2014 #65
Fuck Macys and that waste called a parade. JEB Nov 2014 #66
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Disrupt the Macy's Thanks...»Reply #67