Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Did Mike Brown grab the gun or not? [View all]Recursion
(56,582 posts)1. It can't be forensically proven or disproven, though I don't believe the claim
The jam Wilson's weapon had is consistent with someone holding the side of the gun, but also with the gun being up against someone's arm, and also it sometimes "just happens". Brown's fingerprints on the gun would be pretty clear proof he did, but their lack isn't disproof. (And if they had been found on the gun, we definitely would have heard about it.) The gunshot to Brown's hand is consistent with someone reaching "towards" (to keep it neutral) a gun, or someone shielding himself with his arms.
What I'm really interested in (and haven't seen yet in any of the autopsy evidence) is powder residue on Brown's clothing and hands.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
71 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
It can't be forensically proven or disproven, though I don't believe the claim
Recursion
Nov 2014
#1
Oh, I guess that would explain the lack of any solid answer about it.
PersonNumber503602
Nov 2014
#2
Damn shame there wasn't any body cameras, or at least a dash board cam.
PersonNumber503602
Nov 2014
#6
His testimony has a long, tortured explanation of why he didn't go for his mace or baton
Recursion
Nov 2014
#7
At least he didn't claim to have grabbed (and used) the gun by accident, like J. Meserle did.
nomorenomore08
Nov 2014
#10
Ahh, that most lethal and aggressive action first mentality that far too many police officers have
PersonNumber503602
Nov 2014
#12
That does not definitely demonstrate anything, according to the very pathologist being quoted
alcibiades_mystery
Nov 2014
#14
It was in the autopsy report, gun shot in Brown's hand, soft tissue recovered from the vehicle
snooper2
Nov 2014
#36
Which only shows that he was shot in the hand, not that he was grabbing for a gun
alcibiades_mystery
Nov 2014
#44
I hate saying it like this, but on the "pro Brown" side, is there any comment the forensics
PersonNumber503602
Nov 2014
#9
Everyone (myself included) comes at these cases with pre-conceived notions.
nomorenomore08
Nov 2014
#11
As nomorenomore08 said below, grabbing a cops gun does sound suicidal.
PersonNumber503602
Nov 2014
#19
Every sentence out of Wilson's mouth is carefully crafted by attorney to match the statute
alcibiades_mystery
Nov 2014
#29
"It's ridiculous. His entire testimony is ridiculous. And everybody knows it."
nomorenomore08
Nov 2014
#48
I doubt it. Unless he was suicidal, and I've seen no indication that he was.
nomorenomore08
Nov 2014
#8
I'm glad I'm not the only one who found that an incredibly arrogant post. n/t
nomorenomore08
Nov 2014
#49
Even if he did that would have been long before he had his hands up and was exicuted. nt
Quixote1818
Nov 2014
#34
Can't be proven now, Wilson put his own gun into an evidence bag and washed his hands
Rex
Nov 2014
#47