Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Legal Experts Explain Why The Ferguson Grand Jury Was Set Up For Failure [View all]Lars39
(26,540 posts)30. I'd go back even farther than the grand jury...who is on the commission that chooses them?
And who chooses those on the commission? If the commission is stacked with racists with an agenda(oxymoron there, huh), then there's a good chance they are very carefully putting people on the grand jury who will be compliant to the commission's goals, ie indict as many black people as possible. Judges need to be looked at also.
Racism is systemic, and it sounds like their entire justice system could be tainted.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
47 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Legal Experts Explain Why The Ferguson Grand Jury Was Set Up For Failure [View all]
loyalsister
Nov 2014
OP
Exactly. Having served on a grand jury, I realize how careful prosecutors are.
TygrBright
Nov 2014
#1
Defendants normally have the right to testify at the grand jury, if they so choose.
branford
Nov 2014
#23
That's the point. This was a secret 'Star Chamber' proceeding and none of us
KingCharlemagne
Nov 2014
#18
Correct. No presumption at the grand jury stage. But for people on DU there should be no
JDPriestly
Nov 2014
#35
I did not meant to suggest that there should be a presumption of innocence at the grand jury
JDPriestly
Nov 2014
#36
Thanks for this, I thought his speaking would be a good thing. He was probably coached very well.
freshwest
Nov 2014
#6
I agree, but will voices to disengage win out? Even the Browns said to work to change the system.
freshwest
Nov 2014
#13
I respect and appreciate your actions and the ground work there. I feel better reading it. Thanks.
freshwest
Nov 2014
#17
Thanks for clarifying. I could only find the fragment and it didn't say who it was, Just GJ.
freshwest
Nov 2014
#12
If the prosecutor had only called the witnesses who claimed that Wilson stood over Brown
Nye Bevan
Nov 2014
#9
Well he said Wilson never stood over the body, but a picture from a camera phone says
Rex
Nov 2014
#22
I'd go back even farther than the grand jury...who is on the commission that chooses them?
Lars39
Nov 2014
#30
My comments on this thread and others only pertain to what the grand jury and related
branford
Nov 2014
#46
mcculloch acted as darren wilson's defense attorney...there was no prosecutor in this case
spanone
Nov 2014
#38
It was reported on TV today that tens of thousands of cases go to the Grand Jury. Only
sammy750
Nov 2014
#47