Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

badtoworse

(5,957 posts)
25. I agree with you about the Police Chief's Statement.
Wed Nov 26, 2014, 01:17 PM
Nov 2014

It definitely contradicts what McCulloch said and I'm a little surprised no reporter asked about it the press conference. That is a point that definitely needs to be addressed. It's such an obvious point that I don't see how it could not have come up during the GJ proceedings. I don't have an explanation, but it's possible the Police Chief did not have all the facts when he made the statement.

I'm pretty skeptical that the discrepancy is part of a conspiracy having taken place, as a number of posters have suggested. I would think that a lot of evidence would have to be altered, a number of people would have to be onboard with a revised story and all would have to be consistent with each other. There couldn't be any leaks other or it would unravel pretty quickly and all of this would have to be done with the feds watching. Anything is possible, but successfully pulling off something like that would be very difficult in my opinion. Moreover, that assumes that everyone from the county prosecutor on down would be willing to participate. To be sure, there are a lot of dirtbags on police forces around the country, but I believe that most LEO's are honest, principled people whose moral compass would not allow them to participate in such a conspiracy. Even the dirtbags would have to weigh the risk and consequences of being caught before agreeing to alter evidence to get Brown off the hook. To me, the idea of a conspiracy is pretty far-fetched and I expect that there is a plausible explanation for what the chief said.

I don't have the time to read through the transcripts and evidence, but I'm sure a lot of people on DU are doing that now. We will undoubtedly learn more as that goes on and perhaps the question of probable cause will be definitively answered.

We really need to hear from the Justice Department on this matter to gain some perspective on this and hopefully, that will happen soon.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Against a cop? That blue line thing sure as shit is a strong one. uppityperson Nov 2014 #1
Wilson was fired from his last job, his whole Dept was fired. A real prosecutor would have sabrina 1 Nov 2014 #2
i've seen it noiretextatique Nov 2014 #14
I am less than certain that body cams on cops will have the desired effect IDemo Nov 2014 #3
True, they can manipulate evidence. However, I did read that in at least one precinct, police sabrina 1 Nov 2014 #4
There must be mandatory penalties for turning off the cameras too. BillZBubb Nov 2014 #6
If the prosecutor made an effort to get an indictment it would have happened. BillZBubb Nov 2014 #5
Agree on all counts! etherealtruth Nov 2014 #7
yep. Little Star Nov 2014 #12
Yes, I think it's obvious that the Prosecutor did not want an indictment of Wilson. sabrina 1 Nov 2014 #15
Thanks for posting. JEB Nov 2014 #8
11 out of 162,000. Talk about beating the odds. JEB Nov 2014 #9
That was federal. This was done by state yeoman6987 Nov 2014 #11
I've heard that the feds have a tougher standard for indictment. JEB Nov 2014 #13
That's why people say that a prosecutor, if s/he WANTS it, could indict a ham sandwich. sabrina 1 Nov 2014 #19
Saw that stay earlier. Great sign - spot on underpants Nov 2014 #10
It's rare because prosecutors don't go to grand juries with cases that are not winnable. badtoworse Nov 2014 #16
I'm not sure what you are asking. But what I think is that McCullough should have recused himself sabrina 1 Nov 2014 #17
Assuming the grand jury heard everything, what difference did what McCulloch thought make? badtoworse Nov 2014 #18
Was there anyone there to question any of the 'evidence' presented? Why do you think he would be sabrina 1 Nov 2014 #20
I think you misinterpreted what I said badtoworse Nov 2014 #21
I was in a rush when I responded to your comment earlier. Just wanted to say that you made some good sabrina 1 Nov 2014 #23
I agree with you about the Police Chief's Statement. badtoworse Nov 2014 #25
We know now how this was handled before the GJ. It appears that a second officer gave testimony sabrina 1 Nov 2014 #32
You're following this closer than I am. badtoworse Nov 2014 #35
Wilson did not write a report, which is standard procedure for cops, until long after the shooting. sabrina 1 Nov 2014 #36
I'm going to wait to hear what the feds have to say badtoworse Nov 2014 #38
Did the GJ hear from the witness who saw everything from the beginning? The friend who sabrina 1 Nov 2014 #22
I disagree on one thing: the system *failed*, as it so often has for black folks..... AverageJoe90 Nov 2014 #24
"So who was representing Mike Brown?" JEB Nov 2014 #26
And hasn't it just been revealed that McCullough was raising funds for Wilson?? If that is true, sabrina 1 Nov 2014 #27
This is hopeful, but it will get ugly soon. JEB Nov 2014 #31
Yes, I followed those protests on Twitter last night. Thanks for that link, there were apparently sabrina 1 Nov 2014 #33
Absolutely a conflict of interest. JEB Nov 2014 #34
a district attorney could have a grand jury indict a bologna sandwich LanternWaste Nov 2014 #28
You can't fail if you don't even try. nt TBF Nov 2014 #29
I always thought a DA's job was to prosecute suspects. Rex Nov 2014 #30
It depends on the 'suspect' is what I am learning. sabrina 1 Nov 2014 #37
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Ferguson Prosecutor, ...»Reply #25