Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

In reply to the discussion: Question. McCulloch [View all]
 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
1. He should be brought up on charges...he had a conflict of interest..
Wed Nov 26, 2014, 01:31 PM
Nov 2014

he was on the board raising money to SUPPORT Darren Wilson.

The National Bar Association is appalled.

Last night, the National Bar Association, "the nation's oldest and largest national network of predominantly African-American attorneys and judges," issued a statement calling for Federal Charges to be brought against Officer Wilson.
WASHINGTON, DC – The National Bar Association is questioning how the Grand Jury, considering the evidence before them, could reach the conclusion that Darren Wilson should not be indicted and tried for the shooting death of Michael Brown. National Bar Association President Pamela J. Meanes expresses her sincere disappointment with the outcome of the Grand Jury’s decision but has made it abundantly clear that the National Bar Association stands firm and will be calling on the U.S. Department of Justice to pursue federal charges against officer Darren Wilson. “We will not rest until Michael Brown and his family has justice” states Pamela Meanes, President of the National Bar Association.....

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Question. McCulloch [View all] mainstreetonce Nov 2014 OP
He should be brought up on charges...he had a conflict of interest.. VanillaRhapsody Nov 2014 #1
Just a note, this is the National Bar Association NV Whino Nov 2014 #4
thank you....it slipped my mind but that is exactly right... VanillaRhapsody Nov 2014 #5
Debunked SickOfTheOnePct Nov 2014 #6
and it says.. VanillaRhapsody Nov 2014 #7
And your point would be...? SickOfTheOnePct Nov 2014 #8
He WAS "or is" on the President of the Board..... VanillaRhapsody Nov 2014 #9
They didn't say they couldn't control who makes donations to their organization SickOfTheOnePct Nov 2014 #10
IMO, he obstructed justice. notadmblnd Nov 2014 #2
Good point. Obstruction of justice mainstreetonce Nov 2014 #3
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Question. McCulloch»Reply #1