Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

In reply to the discussion: Question. McCulloch [View all]
 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
7. and it says..
Wed Nov 26, 2014, 09:23 PM
Nov 2014

“No way for non-profits to easily ‘police’ others claiming to raise funds to ‘benefit’ their cause.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Question. McCulloch [View all] mainstreetonce Nov 2014 OP
He should be brought up on charges...he had a conflict of interest.. VanillaRhapsody Nov 2014 #1
Just a note, this is the National Bar Association NV Whino Nov 2014 #4
thank you....it slipped my mind but that is exactly right... VanillaRhapsody Nov 2014 #5
Debunked SickOfTheOnePct Nov 2014 #6
and it says.. VanillaRhapsody Nov 2014 #7
And your point would be...? SickOfTheOnePct Nov 2014 #8
He WAS "or is" on the President of the Board..... VanillaRhapsody Nov 2014 #9
They didn't say they couldn't control who makes donations to their organization SickOfTheOnePct Nov 2014 #10
IMO, he obstructed justice. notadmblnd Nov 2014 #2
Good point. Obstruction of justice mainstreetonce Nov 2014 #3
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Question. McCulloch»Reply #7