General Discussion

IdaBriggs

(10,559 posts)

45. The non-corrupt ones were hired back. The corrupt ones, or even just those

Wed Nov 26, 2014, 11:02 PM

Nov 2014

Who didn't behave with the highest levels of integrity, were NOT hired back. (Go google Jennings corruption, etc.)

But frankly, those would be awesome questions for him to answer under oath while establishing his "credibility" and "good judgment" about the character of others. Especially "under oath" which testimony could be used against the "bad cops".

They really couldn't afford to put him on the stand, could they? Plus, with his mom's criminal history....

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

73 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

OMFG: "Fake" Josie Account of Michael Brown Killing Matches Wilson Testimony!!! [View all] IdaBriggs Nov 2014 OP

I believe Dorian Johnson's testimony is the most accurate. octoberlib Nov 2014 #1

Why? Indydem Nov 2014 #2

Prove your assertion that he is a criminal and/or liar. IdaBriggs Nov 2014 #4

Blinders much? Indydem Nov 2014 #6

Uh wrong....the police reported that the drivers side window was shot OUTWARDS...the glas VanillaRhapsody Nov 2014 #18

Where is that in the Grand Jury testimony? Indydem Nov 2014 #20

What is wrong with that account? Brown's blood was found in the vehicle, showing pnwmom Nov 2014 #27

Blood was pooling on his right side? Indydem Nov 2014 #29

He was in his right arm. pnwmom Nov 2014 #31

Interesting takeaway on your part. IdaBriggs Nov 2014 #42

He wasn't arrested in Ferguson Indydem Nov 2014 #43

"Arrested on the warrant FROM Ferguson/left for 14 days." IdaBriggs Nov 2014 #49

Where does it say that the warrant was FROM Ferguson? Indydem Nov 2014 #52

Darren Wilson is a liar and a murderer. BillZBubb Nov 2014 #7

And the testimony from witnesses that Brown charged at Wilson? Indydem Nov 2014 #12

gosh, with so much conflicting testimony, it would seem to me that a trial is in order.. frylock Nov 2014 #16

Would losing a trial make you feel like justice was served? Indydem Nov 2014 #17

IN 2010 there were 162,000 Grand Juries....out of those...only 11 were denied... VanillaRhapsody Nov 2014 #21

That is a Federal Court number. Indydem Nov 2014 #23

so just fuck it? frylock Nov 2014 #22

Our justice system is imperfect. Indydem Nov 2014 #26

That's not the standard for indictment woolldog Nov 2014 #53

A few years ago... Indydem Nov 2014 #55

Probable cause is the standard for indictment. woolldog Nov 2014 #57

you understand the difference between homocide and petty theft, don't you? frylock Nov 2014 #72

Wrong. The reason he wasn't indicted was because the prosecutor pnwmom Nov 2014 #28

They were given a range of charges to choose from. Indydem Nov 2014 #30

No, they weren't given a range of charges. To suggest they were is just plain false. pnwmom Nov 2014 #32

Oh, sorry. Wrong. Indydem Nov 2014 #33

Interesting. Well, that spokesman certainly gave the wrong impression, didn't he? pnwmom Nov 2014 #35

So you are saying the spokesman is lying? Indydem Nov 2014 #38

I am saying the spokesman, whether deliberately or not, pnwmom Nov 2014 #39

The article you link to, links to the same one I link to. Indydem Nov 2014 #41

Your link doesn't say what you think it does. pnwmom Nov 2014 #59

The bill of indictment is the result, not the beginning. Indydem Nov 2014 #60

Being GIVEN a range of options is not the same as the prosecutor RECOMMENDING pnwmom Nov 2014 #64

Because he didn't want to prosecute the case. Indydem Nov 2014 #66

It was his job to prosecute, not to PRETEND he was prosecuting. pnwmom Nov 2014 #68

Prosecutorial Discretion Indydem Nov 2014 #69

Ya know, every stinking time I hear someone say that Wilson "acted in good faith" or... bluesbassman Nov 2014 #40

If you can get 12 people, in secret, to not indict Wilson, it doesn't follow ... Quasimodem Nov 2014 #61

It only takes ONE. Indydem Nov 2014 #63

maybe because they were in the minority... stupidicus Nov 2014 #37

That is the journal from azmom Nov 2014 #71

... Dont call me Shirley Nov 2014 #34

So, wait? Indydem Nov 2014 #36

I just noticed...you are all over my thread defending the honor of Wilson IdaBriggs Nov 2014 #51

What is there to say? Indydem Nov 2014 #56

Of course the FAKE FACEBOOK ACCOUNT matches and I am blustering because IdaBriggs Nov 2014 #58

No official record thing? Indydem Nov 2014 #62

Post removed Post removed Nov 2014 #65

I look forward to action from the Justice Department. Indydem Nov 2014 #67

You mean the one where Michael isn't a Super Villain? IdaBriggs Nov 2014 #3

That matches exactly what the forensic pathologist says on CNN BrotherIvan Nov 2014 #5

FINALLY, someone with expertise lays it out for the ugly truth it is. Rex Nov 2014 #9

Nor do they care about facts BrotherIvan Nov 2014 #10

That's it. I read through all his testimony before the Grand Jury. I guess a 22 octoberlib Nov 2014 #8

Care to provide evidence that Wilson was let go for corruption? Indydem Nov 2014 #11

It was all over the news. The whole department was disbanded. octoberlib Nov 2014 #13

That is not evidence that Wilson is corrupt. Indydem Nov 2014 #19

he was probably the one "good cop" at that dept frylock Nov 2014 #24

There were 45 cops on the Jennings police force. Indydem Nov 2014 #25

That's pretty much It. 99th_Monkey Nov 2014 #44

And... PsychGrad Nov 2014 #46

The non-corrupt ones were hired back. The corrupt ones, or even just those IdaBriggs Nov 2014 #45

Here ya go. Rex Nov 2014 #15

Is fake Josie mainstreetonce Nov 2014 #14

No, she claimed to be one of her friends. Don't see her name on the KKK list IdaBriggs Nov 2014 #48

My god! it's coming right for us! obxhead Nov 2014 #47

About the size of it. lonestarnot Nov 2014 #70

Not sure what to believe CullenBohannon Nov 2014 #50

National Bar Association feels differently. IdaBriggs Nov 2014 #54

The shock isn't their creation of a fake facebook account Blue_Tires Nov 2014 #73