Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

In reply to the discussion: Question. McCulloch [View all]

SickOfTheOnePct

(8,710 posts)
10. They didn't say they couldn't control who makes donations to their organization
Wed Nov 26, 2014, 10:51 PM
Nov 2014

They said there was no easy way to control who is using their name in fundraising. Two totally different things.

“No way for non-profits to easily ‘police’ others claiming to raise funds to ‘benefit’ their cause.


Who cares if McCulloch is the president of Backstoppers? Backstoppers received no donations from the group that was selling the pro-Wilson T-shirts.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Question. McCulloch [View all] mainstreetonce Nov 2014 OP
He should be brought up on charges...he had a conflict of interest.. VanillaRhapsody Nov 2014 #1
Just a note, this is the National Bar Association NV Whino Nov 2014 #4
thank you....it slipped my mind but that is exactly right... VanillaRhapsody Nov 2014 #5
Debunked SickOfTheOnePct Nov 2014 #6
and it says.. VanillaRhapsody Nov 2014 #7
And your point would be...? SickOfTheOnePct Nov 2014 #8
He WAS "or is" on the President of the Board..... VanillaRhapsody Nov 2014 #9
They didn't say they couldn't control who makes donations to their organization SickOfTheOnePct Nov 2014 #10
IMO, he obstructed justice. notadmblnd Nov 2014 #2
Good point. Obstruction of justice mainstreetonce Nov 2014 #3
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Question. McCulloch»Reply #10