Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: If 12 witnesses said Wilson shot at Brown as Brown ran away and only 4 witnesses denied that, [View all]Vattel
(9,289 posts)17. That means that there has to be another Grand Jury. That is simply unacceptable.
(In Tennessee v. Garner, 471 U.S. 1 (1985), the Supreme Court of the United States held that under the Fourth Amendment, when a law enforcement officer is pursuing a fleeing suspect, he or she may use deadly force to prevent escape only if the officer has probable cause to believe that the suspect poses a significant threat of death or serious physical injury to the officer or others.)
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
35 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
If 12 witnesses said Wilson shot at Brown as Brown ran away and only 4 witnesses denied that, [View all]
Vattel
Nov 2014
OP
You do not as a jury simply add up the number of accounts and rule in favor of the account with the
kelly1mm
Nov 2014
#1
Your interpretation of my original post was very reasonable (I have now altered it).
Vattel
Nov 2014
#9
haha! I re read your OP and saw the change, thought I missed it the first time, and edited.
kelly1mm
Nov 2014
#11
Credibility is for the trial jury. Sufficency of the evidence is for the grand jury.
rug
Nov 2014
#5
Apparently the grand jury disagreed. Maybe jury nullification? Prosecutorial incompetence? We may
kelly1mm
Nov 2014
#8
The attempt at making it thousands of pages won't stop people from picking it apart.
Rex
Nov 2014
#2
because they didn't get any charts....they didn't get anything but a document dump
VanillaRhapsody
Nov 2014
#4
BUT they didn't get ANY direction from Prosecution which IS his job....you know prosecuting...
VanillaRhapsody
Nov 2014
#24
I absolutely cannot understand how at least an involuntary manslaughter bill wasn't returned
Recursion
Nov 2014
#7
And shooting a fleeing felon is not even legal if they do not pose an immediate danger.
Vattel
Nov 2014
#13
The Assistant district attorneys gave the jury a copy of a statute that hasn't been legal since 1985
PDJane
Nov 2014
#14
The Michael Baden private autopsy said that a wound to the arm was consistent with Brown being shot
aint_no_life_nowhere
Nov 2014
#26
That means that there has to be another Grand Jury. That is simply unacceptable.
Vattel
Nov 2014
#17
The problem is that was NOT the statute given the Grand Jury at the beginning of...
Spazito
Nov 2014
#25