Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: "Michael Brown wasn't shot in the back, so Wilson didn't shoot at him while he was running away" [View all]heaven05
(18,124 posts)79. of course there
were shots from the rear, the racist clown was intent on murdering a black "demon" that day. Demon is wilsonthepigs word.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
94 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
"Michael Brown wasn't shot in the back, so Wilson didn't shoot at him while he was running away" [View all]
justiceischeap
Nov 2014
OP
Wecht is clearly p'od about how this has unfolded. I hope we hear more from him.
hlthe2b
Nov 2014
#1
It wasn't photographed by the initial coroner on scene because his batteries were dead
justiceischeap
Nov 2014
#3
THIS IS PIVOTAL!! Wilson "claims he never shot at Brown..FROM..the back after the FPD said he did!!!
uponit7771
Nov 2014
#6
Eyewitnesses report him stopping and turning and then walking back towardt he officer briefly
indivisibleman
Nov 2014
#92
Does anyone have a reference to Drs Baden and Wechts statement about exit wound in Browns arm?!
uponit7771
Nov 2014
#9
pattern of shot, a couple up arm, to neck, to eye, to head shot. you can find him
seabeyond
Nov 2014
#55
what person would get an eyeball shot, then put their head down to charge. fuckin stupid.
seabeyond
Nov 2014
#65
It's easy for you to point at a poster and claim they are misleading, but quite another
rhett o rick
Nov 2014
#43
You're right they are not trained to fire warning shots due to a bullet ricochet
helpmetohelpyou
Nov 2014
#27
There appears to be 4 secs of silence from when the recording starts until you hear the 1st gunshot
True Earthling
Nov 2014
#34
You can believe one of those witnesses if you wish, but you can't believe both.
A Simple Game
Nov 2014
#73
It was the insistence that he was shot in the back, now backtracking that is the problem.
maced666
Nov 2014
#22
on knees shot in back of head. bullshit. i never heard this garbage. talk about
seabeyond
Nov 2014
#30
There was one witness in the GJ transcript who said Michael Brown was on his knees
True Earthling
Nov 2014
#36
ya. and woud that not be interesting to explore, as wilson got shot in the eye, dropped to knees,
seabeyond
Nov 2014
#40
i mean. the man is falling to the ground, DYING.... before the head shot, and that is really
seabeyond
Nov 2014
#42
I'm not supporting anything. I was just pointing out how that rumor or allegation
True Earthling
Nov 2014
#46
now PROVE to me that rumor is even there. cause i fuckin never heard that rumor, and that is what i
seabeyond
Nov 2014
#47
ok. whether the eyeball shot caused him to fal to the knees, or the neck shot caused him to fall to
seabeyond
Nov 2014
#59
I think there are two people that know the truth and it depends on whose truth you believe
justiceischeap
Nov 2014
#61
totally disgusted. i saw the shot pattern. totally made sense, forensically to me
seabeyond
Nov 2014
#53
What the prosecutor did is he gave interviews to the grand jury which he knew
helpmetohelpyou
Nov 2014
#41
I documented all the initial statements in the first week of this event.
indivisibleman
Nov 2014
#63
Objectivity is good. My position is that Mike Brown had no reason to turn around unless
GoneFishin
Nov 2014
#45
The evidence presented before the grand jury is tainted. I don't believe shit!
Liberal_Stalwart71
Nov 2014
#48