General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I wonder how African American members of DU feel about the following post [View all]AverageJoe90
(10,745 posts)On Thu Nov 27, 2014, 12:18 PM an alert was sent on the following post:
it's rather a test for the owners isn't it? I would say
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=5879874
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
Personal attack against admin - plus some bullshit.
dissruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, and otherwise inappropriate
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Thu Nov 27, 2014, 12:26 PM, and the Jury voted 1-6 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: I can understand the frustration, but saying that Skinner and co. "sold their souls" is going a little too far, I feel.
And, by the way, though I'm not exactly all that trusting of CreekDog, given that sometimes he'll post these kinds of OPs for a not-so-honest agenda, that DI post he linked to isn't exactly savoury....though it seems that at least one person on the jury(#1) actually left it alone just so people could see the B.S.; not something I agree with, but it's not the same as outright approval.....unlike what #2 and #3 did(shame on you two!).
So yeah, there we have it.
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Admins can take it. It's about discussionist, not DU.
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: This is yet another observation on discussionist which has already had similar observations.
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
-----