Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Yes shenmue Nov 2014 #1
i agree drray23 Nov 2014 #2
There is one marym625 Nov 2014 #44
Sorry not specifically on this marym625 Nov 2014 #55
It won't happen, but I agree it was gross misconduct, and they should be disbarred still_one Nov 2014 #3
I would love to see Lawrence on MTP as host. LawDeeDah Nov 2014 #4
+1 SunSeeker Nov 2014 #14
He'd treat the position with respect, a true breakthrough. n/t Judi Lynn Nov 2014 #22
Hell, yes. It would be watchable then. nt valerief Nov 2014 #34
Video doesn't work for me. What were his allegations? Wella Nov 2014 #5
The prosecutors supplied the grand jury with a statute that had been ruled unconstitutional 20score Nov 2014 #7
Thank you, 20score.. Happy Thanksgiving to you! Cha Nov 2014 #15
Thank you, Cha! Happy Thanksgiving! 20score Nov 2014 #18
Recommend! KoKo Nov 2014 #60
Criminal misconduct. Kingofalldems Nov 2014 #6
An Asst. D.A. gave grand jury copies of unconstitutional statute OKing shooting fleeing suspects. Shrike47 Nov 2014 #8
Wow.. of the many many mistakes the prosecutor made, that is a huge one. dixiegrrrrl Nov 2014 #13
"Mistakes" toddwv Nov 2014 #46
It's a mistake if he thought he could get away with it. But it was intentional to favor Wilson. WinkyDink Nov 2014 #50
So What Are People Gonna Do About It billhicks76 Nov 2014 #85
THAT is the key question. EVERYONE should be asking that. calimary Nov 2014 #114
Can you weigh in marym625 Nov 2014 #77
Disbar them. End of story. Mike Niendorff Nov 2014 #9
Truly amazing. Absolutely dishonest. Is there no legal recourse here? (nt) enough Nov 2014 #10
hope something is done samsingh Nov 2014 #11
Absolutely 100% on purpose BrotherIvan Nov 2014 #12
Bingo! valerief Nov 2014 #35
K & R SunSeeker Nov 2014 #16
W.O.W. Locrian Nov 2014 #17
Yet we have racist and gun humping posters breathlessly defending them. morningfog Nov 2014 #19
Move along, move along, nothing to see here.... woolldog Nov 2014 #49
Thank you. n/t marym625 Nov 2014 #57
Thank you so much for posting this Number23 Nov 2014 #20
NULLIFY THIS GRAND JURY FOR IMPROPER PROCEDURE!!! NOW!!! NT SidneyR Nov 2014 #21
They don't need to, there is no double jeopardy attached to a grand jury BrotherIvan Nov 2014 #53
Yes lovemydog Nov 2014 #102
He leaves out what they mentioned on November 21, 2014 JonLP24 Nov 2014 #23
There is a problem: it would confuse a reasonable juror. strategery blunder Nov 2014 #29
seems like there was a dog whistle in there for those who prefer "states rights" over federal law bettyellen Nov 2014 #32
It reminds me of the Zimmerman trial... ReRe Nov 2014 #36
I resign myself from the discussion as it appears to be over my level of expertise JonLP24 Nov 2014 #37
No. marym625 Nov 2014 #61
You may be correct JonLP24 Nov 2014 #65
There is no question I am right marym625 Nov 2014 #67
Flanders is the Saint Louis law professor JonLP24 Nov 2014 #69
WOW! marym625 Nov 2014 #71
More from him JonLP24 Nov 2014 #72
This is amazing marym625 Nov 2014 #75
He makes a distinction for civil cases JonLP24 Nov 2014 #86
But it's about what the police can do marym625 Nov 2014 #87
Lawrence v Texas was a criminal case JonLP24 Nov 2014 #88
Garner was a civil case marym625 Nov 2014 #89
Here's a decent abstract on it marym625 Nov 2014 #91
I actually read the entire decision before JonLP24 Nov 2014 #93
Lisa is an attorney marym625 Nov 2014 #95
I understand what you're saying JonLP24 Nov 2014 #96
I understand what you are saying marym625 Nov 2014 #98
It's more complicated than you're recognizing. Jim Lane Nov 2014 #104
First, thank you marym625 Nov 2014 #108
I just went back and read marym625 Nov 2014 #111
Because they don't. marym625 Nov 2014 #52
Agree. The grand jury's questions to Wilson may have been thwarted boston bean Nov 2014 #63
The whole dawn thing stinks marym625 Nov 2014 #64
The Asst P.A. used DELIBERATELY BAD GRAMMAR to CONFUSE the GJ. WinkyDink Nov 2014 #56
Hey while the statute heaven05 Nov 2014 #24
Wouldn't this be obstruction of justice? icymist Nov 2014 #25
+ underpants Nov 2014 #26
Yup! Suich Nov 2014 #27
Happy Thanksgiving to you too, my friend! 20score Nov 2014 #43
Here it is on youtube, 20score.. if you want to put it in your OP.. Cha Nov 2014 #28
Thank you! I couldn't find it earlier. 20score Nov 2014 #42
K&R! This post should have hundreds of recommendations! Enthusiast Nov 2014 #30
Thank you for this. H2O Man Nov 2014 #31
Kick nt List left Nov 2014 #33
Surely DOJ knows about this... ReRe Nov 2014 #38
I dont think you can punish a prosecutor for misconduct because he got a no true bill davidn3600 Nov 2014 #39
Nevertheless, prosecutors are still subject to the Rules of Professional Conduct and can 20score Nov 2014 #41
I may be wrong, but from what I've read the following is true passiveporcupine Nov 2014 #40
no, that's incorrect marym625 Nov 2014 #45
There is no proof that Brown attacked Wilson Bjorn Against Nov 2014 #51
+++++ BrotherIvan Nov 2014 #54
Just what came to my mind when I saw pictures marym625 Nov 2014 #66
Here's what came to my mind ... eppur_se_muova Nov 2014 #74
yep. disgusting. marym625 Nov 2014 #76
LOL azmom Nov 2014 #106
1. Not Missouri law. 2. "...once Brown attacked Wilson" was not proven in a court of law. WinkyDink Nov 2014 #59
Thank you for posting marym625 Nov 2014 #47
Deliberate obfuscation The Wizard Nov 2014 #48
This dame, a lawyer trained in the exquisitely precise use of words, spoke literal nonsense. WinkyDink Nov 2014 #62
Kick for visibility! BrotherIvan Nov 2014 #58
Kick shanti Nov 2014 #68
Thanks for posting! loyalsister Nov 2014 #70
Thank you for posting. Shared with my social network and Socialist and KingCharlemagne Nov 2014 #73
I believe the use of that archaic law... nikto Nov 2014 #78
K&R JEB Nov 2014 #79
I just marked a whole bunch of Lawrence's shows from youtube for my tv. LawDeeDah Nov 2014 #80
K & R +++ Thespian2 Nov 2014 #81
I saw the show, sadoldgirl Nov 2014 #82
Hmmmmf. Hope that mother fucking murderer was worth the money you spent for law school and any lonestarnot Nov 2014 #83
Time for a new grand jury! Takket Nov 2014 #84
K&R. I've seen lots of misconduct identified in this case but missed this one. Outrageous! Overseas Nov 2014 #90
"With Prosecutors Like this, Darren Wilson Never Really Needed a Defense Lawyer."! My blood Cha Nov 2014 #92
This, on top of everything else Jack Rabbit Nov 2014 #94
As usual, Lawrence spells it out Iwillnevergiveup Nov 2014 #97
Why do cops shoot to kill? Lefergus70 Nov 2014 #99
Stinks blkmusclmachine Nov 2014 #100
Makes you wonder - if they make "mistakes" like this in high-profile, highly scrutanized cases baldguy Nov 2014 #101
Are you fucking kidding me? blackspade Nov 2014 #103
O'Donnell did a great job here Gothmog Nov 2014 #105
Posted to for later watching n/t 1StrongBlackMan Nov 2014 #107
Incompetence Of The Highest Order - Impeach The Prosecutors - Republican Heads Explode cantbeserious Nov 2014 #109
I was watching Lawrence's show when he articulated what had happened and... Spazito Nov 2014 #110
Its disgusting that the Proscutor's office is going to get away with this. SweetieD Nov 2014 #112
Many things have been broght to light on many different issues INdemo Nov 2014 #113
Why is this not being investigated uponit7771 Dec 2014 #115
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Lawrence O'Donnell uncove...»Reply #21