Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
24. just so you know
Fri Nov 28, 2014, 12:54 AM
Nov 2014

AUTOMATED MESSAGE: Results of your Jury Service

Mail Message
On Thu Nov 27, 2014, 08:43 PM an alert was sent on the following post:

I wonder why you come here?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=5880423

REASON FOR ALERT

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.

ALERTER'S COMMENTS

I'm pretty sure this is the definition of rude and inappropriate.

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Thu Nov 27, 2014, 08:51 PM, and the Jury voted 2-5 to LEAVE IT.

Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: False equivalency trying to yank DUers to RW sites from what posters on the thread who googled it as the OP requested. OP is flamebait that author is trying to hide by not linking. Language is rough but shining DU on is worse.
OP has been here long enough to know better, but suddenly comes out of the woodpile with this. I'm sorry, but I'm not going to hide the comment by bravenak. Stop playing games with us. It's not funny right now, a lot of people are feeling raw.


Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Original post is, to say the least, unhelpful. Response (on which I'm voting) is useless, as well. Let everyone see the stupidity.

Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.

Cannot reply to automated messages

Alert abuse Delete this DU Mail

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

We need a link. bravenak Nov 2014 #1
All I see is a bunch of RW bullshit Nevernose Nov 2014 #2
yes, it is the thinking of the stupid. A police officer was gunned down so all police officers samsingh Nov 2014 #11
You read about him and thought it interesting , so you first. That is how creating OPS works. bettyellen Nov 2014 #3
a thinly-veiled attempt to use this officer's death noiretextatique Nov 2014 #4
don't you mean brown's murder? samsingh Nov 2014 #12
thanks, fixed it. noiretextatique Nov 2014 #14
How do you pronounce your user name- phonetically? It sure is an interesting one. bettyellen Nov 2014 #5
My name is a combo of mine and my wife's name. JohLast Nov 2014 #19
Did you figure out what you think about it yet? bravenak Nov 2014 #6
Starting up where you left off yesterday? GGJohn Nov 2014 #7
I wonder why you come here? bravenak Nov 2014 #8
in a smelly dingy house samsingh Nov 2014 #13
... noiretextatique Nov 2014 #15
just so you know azurnoir Nov 2014 #24
New York officer shot, killed after crazed man snatches gun from holster seveneyes Nov 2014 #9
alerted on this blatant flamebait noiretextatique Nov 2014 #10
My thoughts. JohLast Nov 2014 #18
my thoughts: if you had an opinion noiretextatique Nov 2014 #20
So what - last week a right wing nut set a fire and shot the first responding officer csziggy Nov 2014 #16
Here's a link. NaturalHigh Nov 2014 #17
Very sad. 840high Nov 2014 #26
You say you're former cop, now teaching at the police academy but don't know how to paste links? uppityperson Nov 2014 #21
not from this new phone JohLast Nov 2014 #22
Here's my thoughts: JaneyVee Nov 2014 #23
you are correct JohLast Nov 2014 #25
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Officer David Smith, John...»Reply #24