Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

There was more than enough for an indictment... SomethingFishy Nov 2014 #1
knowing what i know now, i'm glad there was no indictment... unblock Nov 2014 #4
You have a good point.. SomethingFishy Nov 2014 #5
you mean a conflict beyond the conflict prosecutors always have going against the police? unblock Nov 2014 #8
McCullough, the prosecuter, was also the President of the Organization that raised truedelphi Nov 2014 #9
holy crap! he went out of his way to create a conflict of interest after the fact! unblock Nov 2014 #12
Check this out. Rex Nov 2014 #10
wow. just.... wow. unblock Nov 2014 #13
Can this be enough for a DOJ indictment? Leopolds Ghost Nov 2014 #37
I do not think that there is a statute of limitation on avebury Nov 2014 #45
in missouri, from what i can gather -- murder: no limit; voluntary manslaughter: 3 years. unblock Nov 2014 #49
There's no statute of limitations for murder. - nt KingCharlemagne Nov 2014 #64
true, but there may be for lesser homicide charges, e.g., voluntary manslaughter. unblock Nov 2014 #65
Also, if as Wilson claimed 'the next next blow could have been the death blow' lovemydog Nov 2014 #15
Exactly what I think marions ghost Nov 2014 #28
Thanks. elleng Nov 2014 #2
Thanks for that. malokvale77 Nov 2014 #3
at least you actually waited for and absorbed the fatcs noiretextatique Nov 2014 #6
I agree, there was plenty here for at least a manslaughter indictment. NYC_SKP Nov 2014 #7
^^^ Backup was 90 seconds away. Stay in the damn car. Recursion Nov 2014 #11
exactly. DesertFlower Nov 2014 #17
Indeed, Wilson left his car to go after the unarmed black kid and "have his way with him". NYC_SKP Nov 2014 #21
Fucking nuts indeed !!! SamKnause Nov 2014 #25
This asshole. Was he actually a Ferguson cop? Leopolds Ghost Nov 2014 #62
Yes, he was, on the job and on the scene during the first protests in Ferguson! NYC_SKP Nov 2014 #63
Hi NYC :) Leopolds Ghost Nov 2014 #66
Drive away. joshcryer Nov 2014 #31
Or even roll up the window!!! RockaFowler Nov 2014 #44
Thank you for sharing, ecstatic Nov 2014 #14
Perhaps if there is imminent danger to another person, for example lovemydog Nov 2014 #16
Yeap, Brown was unarmed and running away... him looking like a demon shouldn't be uponit7771 Nov 2014 #47
Article from the WaPo: XemaSab Nov 2014 #18
I don't know that Brown was running away when Wilson fired Recursion Nov 2014 #19
Brown died 143 feet from Wilson's vehicle. Thor_MN Nov 2014 #22
And was closer to the car than the second set bloodstains Recursion Nov 2014 #23
So you doubt that he could move 9 feet forward as he was falling dead? Thor_MN Nov 2014 #26
Not if he was running away at the time. Recursion Nov 2014 #27
Agreed, the job of a jury, not a grand jury, to determine Thor_MN Nov 2014 #41
Well we're 100% agreed on that. This was a true bill that a GJ denied Recursion Nov 2014 #42
He was retreating BACKWARDS towards the vehicle! Leopolds Ghost Nov 2014 #38
Well, hell, why were you not deposed? Thor_MN Nov 2014 #43
I was being facetious. Leopolds Ghost Nov 2014 #50
Ok, I accept that you were being an ass. Thor_MN Nov 2014 #53
I guess you've heard of black humor in life and death situations Leopolds Ghost Nov 2014 #54
Apparently you are the sole person allowed to be facetious. Thor_MN Nov 2014 #55
Why yes, yes I am. Leopolds Ghost Nov 2014 #56
Like I said, I agree Thor_MN Nov 2014 #57
I think we are in agreement on the issues here, other than me always being right. ;) Leopolds Ghost Nov 2014 #58
Yup Thor_MN Nov 2014 #59
... I was too modest to say it, but thanks! Leopolds Ghost Nov 2014 #60
........sigh................. alittlelark Nov 2014 #20
Is this an "I told you so," or what? nomorenomore08 Nov 2014 #34
But prosecutor never asked for an indictment on any charge. It was fixed from the beginning. nt kelliekat44 Nov 2014 #24
My fault. I literally didn't conceive of a GJ failing to indict at least on Man 2 Recursion Nov 2014 #40
In the sense that... you don't take it to a grand jury and not get an indictment, right? Leopolds Ghost Nov 2014 #61
Does anyone know if another prosecutor can charge Wilson? joshcryer Nov 2014 #29
Jeopardy doesn't attach with a grand jury Recursion Nov 2014 #30
But if you weren't expecting we'd ever get to read the GJ testimony, pnwmom Nov 2014 #32
Because I thought it would go to trial Recursion Nov 2014 #35
Same. joshcryer Nov 2014 #39
I don't blame you for holding back initially, to be truthful. AverageJoe90 Nov 2014 #33
k/r Leopolds Ghost Nov 2014 #36
I almost think the prosecutor looks worse. Vinca Nov 2014 #46
It's pretty bad - TBF Nov 2014 #48
How did Wilson lose control of the car? Wella Nov 2014 #51
Thanks. There's never anything wrong with honest skepticism Jackpine Radical Nov 2014 #52
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»As someone who said "...»Reply #59