Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: United Nations Calls for an End to Industrialized Farming [View all]RiverLover
(7,830 posts)40. Here's the report~
http://unctad.org/en/pages/PressRelease.aspx?OriginalVersionID=154
When I read it, that is the conclusion I come to as well. Although they use much fancier words.
That's just one extract from the report, but they also talk of the widespread poisoning of chemicals in farming. ("Two types of irreparable environmental damage have already been caused by agriculture: nitrogen contamination of soil and water, and loss of biodiversity;"
This would lead to the logical conclusion that they favor less use of chemical fertilizers & greater controls in disposal of manure from large animal feeding operations or even the end of LAFOs, as well as controls on fields where manure is used in both organic & traditional ag...
It is possible to reach that conclusion when reading it. But I understand some people are unable to take 2 + 2 and get 4 unless someone else spells it out for them. It is has to be from what they deem as a "CREDIBLE" source.
When I read it, that is the conclusion I come to as well. Although they use much fancier words.
The report emphasizes that a shift is necessary towards diverse production patterns that reflect the multi-functionality of agriculture and enhance closed nutrient cycles. Moreover, as the environmental costs of industrial agriculture are largely not accounted for, governments should act to ensure that more food is grown where it is needed. It recommends adjusting trade rules to encourage as much regionalized/localized food production as possible; as much traded food as necessary.
That's just one extract from the report, but they also talk of the widespread poisoning of chemicals in farming. ("Two types of irreparable environmental damage have already been caused by agriculture: nitrogen contamination of soil and water, and loss of biodiversity;"
It is possible to reach that conclusion when reading it. But I understand some people are unable to take 2 + 2 and get 4 unless someone else spells it out for them. It is has to be from what they deem as a "CREDIBLE" source.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
41 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
If many localities in the US could do without peanut butter, bananas, and orange juice.
HereSince1628
Nov 2014
#3
The GCC prediction for most of the upper tier of states doesn't make it more survivable
HereSince1628
Nov 2014
#9
Sometimes I think a statistically negligible quantity of arsenic just isn't enough
Major Nikon
Nov 2014
#16
Thanks for that! I was almost sold but a nagging hint of skepticism kept me reading.
Towlie
Nov 2014
#17
Organic Farmers have no problem telling us what the nutrients are in their soil preparation..
Cha
Nov 2014
#25
You poor thing.. of course I have plenty of choices that aren't connected with your stupid
Cha
Nov 2014
#30
I just think it's a bit strange that all the nutbaggery comes from the same playbook
Major Nikon
Nov 2014
#37
Another report on UN's findings- "New UN report calls for transformation in agriculture"
RiverLover
Nov 2014
#38