Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

wyldwolf

(43,891 posts)
7. So this is a misinterpretation?
Sat Nov 29, 2014, 06:47 PM
Nov 2014
In addition to his other groups, Brock serves as an adviser to the grassroots outreach programme Ready for Hillary, and is on the board of Priorities USA, a fundraising operation devoted to a Clinton candidacy.




And MotherJones - they're misinterpreting it, too?

Brock says he first conceived of Correct the Record last summer. "Having left the State Department," Brock told me, "Clinton didn't have the kind of robust operation that one would have if one was holding public office. That's where I saw the need." He wrote a memo predicting "an uptick in political attacks" against Clinton and proposed a rapid-response group to defend her. As it happened, the very next day America Rising, an opposition research outfit founded by former Mitt Romney and Republican National Committee staff, announced a "Stop Hillary 2016" initiative.

Correct the Record's staff (18 and counting) is crammed into a newsroom-style bullpen in the back corner of the offices of American Bridge 21st Century, Brock's super-PAC. "They're always there; they're working around the clock," former Clinton White House adviser Paul Begala says of the crew. "I always tease David that he finds all of these nerd virgins and locks them away in a vault where they never see sunlight or have a drink or get laid. But God bless them!"

The team has been building an exhaustive database of factoids documenting Clinton's career, as well as compiling opposition research on her putative opponents. With Clinton's own press team largely silent, Correct the Record has become the go-to source for reporters seeking pro-Clinton quotes in response to Republican attacks.

Correct the Record is part of a larger shadow campaign that's gearing up for 2016. It includes Ready for Hillary, which is collecting voter data, and Priorities USA, which is raising big money. "For the first time in my adult life, the left has their shit together," says Begala, who relies on Correct the Record for talking points when he prepares for cable spots as a Hillary surrogate.

http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2014/09/david-brock-hillary-clinton-correct-the-record


And slate?

http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2014/07/david_brock_s_correct_the_record_the_former_right_wing_operative_is_hillary.html

And NY Times?

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/26/us/politics/once-intent-on-bringing-down-a-clinton-now-raising-up-another.html

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I gotten to know David, and we're big supporters of American Bridge brooklynite Nov 2014 #1
oh, the Guardian is lying wyldwolf Nov 2014 #2
No, the Guardian is mis-interpreting... brooklynite Nov 2014 #6
So this is a misinterpretation? wyldwolf Nov 2014 #7
I suppose anything is possible as to this story; what I know is thank god for Media Matters NoJusticeNoPeace Nov 2014 #3
Are those two roles inconsistent? MannyGoldstein Nov 2014 #4
Politico was and still is a RWing cesspool, but the Third Way types here love it. Rex Nov 2014 #14
Seems like the only one mentioning it in this thread is you. wyldwolf Nov 2014 #17
It's called a comparison, not that you would ever figure it out. Rex Nov 2014 #20
It's called 'irrelevant.' wyldwolf Nov 2014 #21
Oh look it is adversarial again. Rex Nov 2014 #23
So you make an irrelevant reply, try to spin it away, say only 3rd Wayers quote Politico... wyldwolf Nov 2014 #24
Oh look it is adversarial again. Rex Nov 2014 #26
Oh look it's irrelevant again wyldwolf Nov 2014 #27
Thanks imitation is the highest form of flattery Rex Nov 2014 #28
Another irrelevant reply wyldwolf Nov 2014 #29
Yes you seem to only be able to respond that way. Rex Nov 2014 #30
Yet another Rex irrelevant reply wyldwolf Nov 2014 #31
Neat unattributed non-quotes in that there concern-trolling (and near plagiarized) article: Denzil_DC Nov 2014 #5
So your point is the article 'borrows' from others that have said the same thing? wyldwolf Nov 2014 #8
Eh? Did that really need posting twice in the same thread? I can scroll, you know. Denzil_DC Nov 2014 #10
Actually, yes it did wyldwolf Nov 2014 #12
"STILL don't know what your point is" Denzil_DC Nov 2014 #13
Is David Brock working for several pro-Clinton organizations? wyldwolf Nov 2014 #15
I think, from what I've read, he's even founded organizations that are pro-Clinton! Denzil_DC Nov 2014 #18
Hillary is the next Dem nominee. Gman Nov 2014 #9
lol AtomicKitten Nov 2014 #11
dun Dun DUN!!! Rex Nov 2014 #16
Hillary Clinton and the Future Failure of Progressive Hope and Change RiverLover Nov 2014 #19
Watch out or you will be mercilessly taunted! Rex Nov 2014 #22
LOL...too funny! Stellar Nov 2014 #25
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Once the scourge of Democ...»Reply #7