Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
138. Los Amigos Terroristas de Bush
Sun Nov 30, 2014, 12:42 AM
Nov 2014

Original OP from 2006: Know your BFEE or "Hey, America! Wake Up and Smell the Sulfur!"

Few today remember a most heinous terrorist act: The assassinations of former Chilean ambassador Orlando Letelier and American Ronnie Karpen Moffit.



Ms. Moffit was an American citizen murdered by agents of a foreign government on U.S. soil. Her only crime was being with Orlando Letelier, whose crime was to speak out against the military coup that toppled the democratically elected Chilean government he served. Because he refused to turn over the Chilean secret police and their American contacts, these assassinations were allowed, if not sanctioned, by George Bush, then director of central intelligence and head of the CIA.

As with all things having to do with the BFEE, the world get worse. So, a reminder:

October will mark the 30th anniversary of another most heinous terrorist act: The bombing of a Cuban civilian airliner that killed 73 passengers and crew. The pilots reported the blast caused their aircraft to catch fire and they were burning up as they attempted an emergency landing. The plane crashed into the Caribbean, a few miles west of Barbados. All aboard perished, including a close friend of the Great DUer malaise.



Cubana Airlines DC-8 like the one bombed by BFEE members Luis Posada Carriles and Orlando Bosch. Both turds have been protected by Poppy and Baby Doc Bush and the CIA, which strangely has been loyal to them rather than to various presidencies before and in-between.

Here’s an excellent essay based on the facts:



The Charmed Life of a Mass Murderer

Posada Carriles and Bush's Anti-Terror Hoax

By SAUL LANDAU
Counterpunch June 9, 2005

President George W. Bush has emphasized that if one of the myriad of U.S. police agencies even suspect someone of planning, abetting or carrying out a terrorist act, he will, at a minimum, get tossed into a dark hole. Indeed, Bush has thrown the Magna Carta into the garbage heap when it comes to Muslims suspected of pernicious thoughts toward the United States.

But if suspected terrorists turn their rage toward the detested Fidel Castro, these rules don't apply.

Indeed, those who try to bomb Cuban targets, or those related to Cuba, receive special treatment. This double-standard casts a shadow over the president's commitment to fight terrorism.

For example, TV footage showed Homeland Security cops arresting Posada in mid May. But the arresting officers didn't even handcuff the Western Hemisphere's most notorious terrorist. (Remember how Bush's pal Ken "Kenny Boy" Lay ­ ENRON's CEO ­ got handcuffed?) Justice Department spokespeople said they plan to charge the foremost terrorist in the western hemisphere with "illegal entry into the United States."

The FBI has reams of files on Posada, affectionately called "Bambi" by his terrorist friends. Former FBI Special Agent Carter Cornick told New York Times reporter Tim Weiner that Posada was "up to his eyeballs" in the October 1976 destruction of a Cuban commercial airliner over Barbados. All 73 passengers and crew members died. Recently published FBI and CIA documents not only confirm Cornick's statement, but also reveal that U.S. agencies had knowledge of the plot and did not inform Cuban authorities or try to stop the bombing.

SNIP…

One wonders: Did Posada announce his illegal presence in the United States with the idea that U.S. government complicity in aiding and abetting his past acts of terrorism would protect him? U.S. authorities didn't inform Cuba or try to stop the 1976 air-bombing plot, and in 1971, as Veciana stated, the CIA made the gun that Posada's agents placed inside the camera to assassinate Castro. And Ollie North has knowledge of Posada's covert activities for U.S. intelligence as well.

CONTINUED…

http://www.counterpunch.org/landau06092005.html



[font color="red"]What ties these two events together is the involvement of George Herbert Walker Bush, as then-CIA director, in their cover-up as crimes and in the protection of their perpetrators, as in the person of one Luis Posada Carriles, Orlando Bosch and their colleagues-in-terror.[/font color]

Think about it: A murder-forgiving CIA director Bush went on to become President of the United States. Today, Bush’s son, George, acts as president. The younger Bush has used his office from Day One to protect and cover-up the crimes of his father.

That’s what Hugo Chavez was talking about when he smelled the sulfur and called Bush “The Devil.”

America needs to wake up and smell the sulfur, too. Here’s some background on the above:



LUIS POSADA CARRILES
THE DECLASSIFIED RECORD


CIA and FBI Documents Detail Career in International Terrorism; Connection to U.S.

National Security Archive Electronic Briefing Book No. 153

http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB153 /

Don’t forget to check out Orlando Bosch, while you’re at it. GOOGLE with Jeb Bush for some interesting connections to the present day.

Democracy Now’s Amy Goodman and Juan Gonzalez interviewed National Security Archive’s Peter Kornbluh and Letelier’s son, Francisco:

http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=06/09/21/153...



Another important point to remember, is Kissinger's close association with Operation CONDOR, the assassination program run out of "The Cone" to silence democrats, liberals, union leaders, progressives, socialists, communists or anyone who stood for justice and equality.



Chile security chief was CIA informer

BBC Tuesday, 19 September, 2000, 23:24 GMT 00:24 UK

Recently declassified documents in the United States show that the former head of the secret police in Chile, Manuel Contreras, was a paid informant for the US intelligence agency, the CIA.

The report, comprising CIA documents requested by the US Congress, show that contact with Contreras began in 1974 - a year after the military coup that brought General Augusto Pinochet to power.

Contreras oversaw the much-feared security service DINA

The report adds that the contact was maintained until 1977 - a year after Contreras plotted the killing of the then Chilean Foreign Minister and foe of General Pinochet, Orlando Letelier, in Washington.

A BBC correspondent in Washington, Nick Bryant, says the documents reinforce the view that the US turned a blind eye towards political repression in Chile during the Pinochet era and that the CIA was complicit in many human rights abuses.

Pinochet's confidant

As head of the security service, DINA, Contreras became the one of the most feared men in Chile, second only to General Pinochet.

The general's iron rule was underpinned by the tactics of brutal repression that saw thousands die and thousands more flee into exile. Others disappeared or were tortured.

CONTINUED…

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/932897.stm



Of course, there are even more sulferous friends than these…



Bush s Longstanding Criminal Mexican Amigos

The disturbing ties of some of George W. Bush's Latino advisors

More on Bush-Amigos links in PBS Frontline interview with Gary Jacobs


By Julie Reynolds
Research assistance by Victor Almazán and Ana Leonor Rojo

LOS AMIGOS DE BUSH

“Dime con quién andas y te diré quién eres. (Tell me who you side with and I will tell you who you are.)” – “George W. Bush for President” web site

Those who say that George W. Bush has scant knowledge of foreign affairs don't understand his family's relationship with Mexico.

If one event could be said to make that relationship visible, it had to be the state dinner given eleven years ago by President Bush for Mexico's president, Carlos Salinas. It was an elegant yet boisterous gala, where the biggest movers and shakers in Texas and Mexico congregated and celebrated. This group was to become W's Mexican legacy, a gift of ties and connections passed on from the father to his son.

SNIP…

The Mexican president had spent a long day with President Bush signing trade pacts, the precursors of NAFTA. Salinas brought his so-called Dream Team: his commerce secretary, finance minister, and his personal Machiavelli, Jose Córdoba. It would later be astounding to see, as the decade unfolded, how many of that administration's proud men and women fell shamefully from grace - some exiled, some imprisoned and some assassinated.

No one knew it then, but many at that banquet would survive to one day help young W beat a path back to the White House. There were loyal "Bushfellas" who were old friends of the family: Commerce Secretary Robert Mosbacher Sr., General Colin Powell, and George Bush Senior's ever-present friend, Secretary of State James Baker. Gary Jacobs, whose Texas bank was about to be bought by the son of Mexico's billionaire-politico Carlos Hank González, was also a guest. Tony Garza, then a young judge, is now a Bush cabinet contender. Today, all are advisors or contributors to W's campaign.

Hidden among the glitterati were two relative unknowns. They were, however, familiar to the group at hand. They were the loyal "Amigos de Bush" from San Antonio: criminal defense lawyer Roy Barrera Jr. and car dealer Ernesto Ancira Jr. In contrast to the Salinas group, the ties of Barrera and Ancira to drug cartels would remain unnoticed for another decade. Their ties to George W. would grow stronger.

CONTINUED…

GOOGLE cache:

http://72.14.209.104/search?q=cache:Th5_dq9beuYJ:www.el...

May also be at:

http://www.newsmakingnews.com/contents10,2,00.htm





Henry Kissinger and Agusto Pinochet

[font size="6"][font color="red"]“I don't see why we need to stand by and watch a country go communist due to the irresponsibility of its people. The issues are much too important for the Chilean voters to be left to decide for themselves.” -- Henry A. Kissinger[/font color][/font size]

Remember: If the guy Poppy's Dim Son wanted to appoint head of the 9-11 Commission feels that way about democracy in Chile, what’s there to make us think he and those for whom he toils believe differently about democracy in the United States of America?

Ed Koch stands up for justice? Wouldn't be prudent. Speed bump.

Thanks for standing up to these fascist warmongers, nationalize the fed. While they may own most all the guns and money in the world, we have the only things that trump them on our side: Truth, Justice and Democracy.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Assange looks like Gandalf. Odin2005 Nov 2014 #1
Co-incidence? You decide! dixiegrrrrl Nov 2014 #5
he should borrow Gandalf's belt snooper2 Dec 2014 #191
k/r nationalize the fed Nov 2014 #2
+1 daleanime Nov 2014 #7
"Assange claims" ... "where he fears" -- there's far too much bias in that phrasing starroute Nov 2014 #3
YOU are suggesting whatever dove-tails with your view. randome Nov 2014 #4
Evidence.... dixiegrrrrl Nov 2014 #11
Truth ... ucrdem Nov 2014 #27
The U.S. is happy where he is hack89 Nov 2014 #8
PoliceLeaks Octafish Nov 2014 #107
Alternate Headline: "Chomsky supports accused rapist". riqster Nov 2014 #6
And one by one we through the voices of Democracy under the bus. zeemike Nov 2014 #10
Not everyone who comments here is a friend of DU. n/t dixiegrrrrl Nov 2014 #13
And you are right. zeemike Nov 2014 #21
So calling an accused criminal an accused criminal makes one a non-friend of DU? riqster Nov 2014 #25
They can't handle the facts, riqster.. and you're sure a friend of Cha Nov 2014 #58
Yes, because democracy exists for men only BainsBane Nov 2014 #14
Well said. riqster Nov 2014 #19
Oh bullshit. zeemike Nov 2014 #20
You were in the room when the sex acts took place? riqster Nov 2014 #23
Well the facts are known zeemike Nov 2014 #24
So the Swedish justice system is pursuing the matter for what reason? riqster Nov 2014 #28
For the reason to put him in the hands of the Americans zeemike Nov 2014 #32
Uh-huh. Evidence supporting your thesis? riqster Nov 2014 #33
Chelsea Manning. zeemike Nov 2014 #37
Those are American judicial and legislative actions/atrocities. Not Swedish. riqster Nov 2014 #42
And it will be Assange's fate if he is extradited. zeemike Nov 2014 #44
I can't agree without some factual basis. Sweden plays it pretty straight as a rule. riqster Nov 2014 #45
It very silly to think he would have to go to Sweden 1st to get to the US.. EX500rider Nov 2014 #49
the UK can't touch him passiveporcupine Mar 2016 #206
Unlawful coercion, sexual molestation (two counts), and rape hack89 Nov 2014 #51
You don't know the facts of the case... SidDithers Nov 2014 #57
"emotion is used as a tool" to "divide us up" YoungDemCA Nov 2014 #79
And I understand you just fine. zeemike Nov 2014 #88
He is a rapist in the mind of the woman assaulted BainsBane Nov 2014 #118
And I can't understand when someone becomes so judgmental zeemike Nov 2014 #131
This message was self-deleted by its author Dont call me Shirley Nov 2014 #60
Not what their allegations state.. Cha Nov 2014 #66
That is simply false, as this evidence shows BainsBane Nov 2014 #117
Thanks for clearing that up. nilesobek Nov 2014 #133
I only got my info from DN. I did not know the allegations were anything other than framed. Dont call me Shirley Nov 2014 #141
Hold on. I wasn't calling for that. nilesobek Dec 2014 #171
Sneaky Assange blames his problems on the USA.. can't stand up and be responsible for his Cha Nov 2014 #65
Excellent post. YoungDemCA Nov 2014 #77
I would disagree with one thing that you wrote. Kali Nov 2014 #92
The 'major international security issues' are non-existent insofar as Assange is concerned. randome Nov 2014 #95
No attorney who wants to keep their license BainsBane Nov 2014 #119
That's a strong argument. nt el_bryanto Dec 2014 #179
For Chomsky, everyone else gets thrown under the bus if it means being able to attack the US stevenleser Dec 2014 #203
He needs to go through the process and be found guilty or not. riqster Nov 2014 #15
Well I hope you find yourself in that position some day. zeemike Nov 2014 #18
Oh, so Sweden is some sort of judicial hellhole? riqster Nov 2014 #22
No but they have the same corruption of government as we have. zeemike Nov 2014 #34
I share your mistrust as a general rule. But I have yet.to see examples in this case. riqster Nov 2014 #35
Well if you can't find it, it never happened. zeemike Nov 2014 #38
I woudn't go that far. But in such a case, I wouldn't assume it to be likely. riqster Nov 2014 #41
This is Sweden's Law on Rapists.. Cha Nov 2014 #67
Thank you. n/t YoungDemCA Nov 2014 #100
there is no universe where Assange OR Chomsky represent, in any way, Democracy. KittyWampus Nov 2014 #115
Hmmm, who to go with, Riqster or Chomsky? Not a tough choice. Comrade Grumpy Nov 2014 #12
Actually, neither. The Swedish courts are the only true authority. riqster Nov 2014 #16
Lol, you haven't been keeping up with this sham 'case' have you? Still not even a charge filed sabrina 1 Nov 2014 #26
If and when the Swedish courts take such steps, his legal status will change. riqster Nov 2014 #31
Where are the CHARGES? Amazing to see 'liberals' condone the imprisonment of a news editor for sabrina 1 Nov 2014 #61
Just show me the imprisonment brooklynite Nov 2014 #62
He long ago was in Sweden asking to speak to the prosecutor and was told 'she was too busy'. sabrina 1 Nov 2014 #104
I understand U.S. Intelligence put pressure on the Eleanors38 Nov 2014 #46
Sweden's PM was helped attain his position by KARL ROVE, an OLD FRIEND. He is known as 'Europe's sabrina 1 Nov 2014 #63
A lot of (parroted) conspiracy theories... YoungDemCA Nov 2014 #82
What are the charges you are speaking of?? sabrina 1 Nov 2014 #101
Forget it, (s)he's rolling... SidDithers Nov 2014 #108
OK, maybe she was a Western asset. nilesobek Nov 2014 #135
Last week a Swedish appeals court upheld Assange's arrest warrant hack89 Nov 2014 #53
Lol, of course they did. Just show us the CHARGES. There have never been any charges filed against sabrina 1 Nov 2014 #64
There are four charges specified in his arrest warrant hack89 Nov 2014 #69
It's been explained dozens of times, but some people just like to post zappaman Nov 2014 #70
I asked for CHARGES filed against him. What you gave me are years old allegations sabrina 1 Nov 2014 #102
So charges detailed in a legal arrest warrant are not really charges? hack89 Nov 2014 #110
He has not been charged with any crime. What about that is so difficult for you to grasp?? sabrina 1 Nov 2014 #146
An arrest warrant has to reference criminal charges hack89 Nov 2014 #148
This is pure unmitigated nonsense and the only reason I am wasting my time responding to it, is sabrina 1 Dec 2014 #172
Assange's lawyer testified under oath that the prosecutor wanted to interview him in Sweden hack89 Dec 2014 #173
Wrong, AGAIN. What is in black and white is the FACT that Assange was interviewed by the sabrina 1 Dec 2014 #175
So you are denying an actual, black and white trial transcript? hack89 Dec 2014 #176
There are NO Criminal or any other kind of charges filed against Assange. Are you still trying to sabrina 1 Dec 2014 #182
This message was self-deleted by its author hack89 Dec 2014 #183
Do you deny there is a valid arrest warrant for Assange? hack89 Dec 2014 #184
Still refusing to answer a simple question? Where are the charges you claimed existed? sabrina 1 Dec 2014 #186
Those accusations just survived a legal challenge two weeks ago hack89 Dec 2014 #187
Lol, the Swedish Court has been saying that for YEARS now but still they will not PROVE IT. sabrina 1 Dec 2014 #190
You need a trial to prove the charges. To have a trial you need a defendant hack89 Dec 2014 #192
Yes!! Exactly!! So, why has this Prosecutor REFUSED to file any charges?? sabrina 1 Dec 2014 #194
Because the Swedish system is different from ours hack89 Dec 2014 #196
We know the differences. And we know the Prosecutor has LIED about needing to sabrina 1 Dec 2014 #197
Has Assange agree to surrender if arrested following an interview? hack89 Dec 2014 #198
Where are the charges? Why have no charges been filed? Why would someone sabrina 1 Dec 2014 #199
People are arrested and taken into custody prior to indictment every day in America. hack89 Dec 2014 #200
Lol, OUR legal system? What does OUR legal system have to do with this? Was that a slip sabrina 1 Dec 2014 #201
It will all be over in 2020 when the statute of limitations runs out. hack89 Dec 2014 #202
Your conspiracy buzzword filled rants are amusing. Odin2005 Dec 2014 #204
What conspiracy buzzwords are you talking about? I deal only in facts. sabrina 1 Dec 2014 #205
I believe Assange's lawyer. Don't you? hack89 Dec 2014 #185
Where are the charges? A simple answer is all I am asking for. sabrina 1 Dec 2014 #188
I understand why you don't want to talk about him fleeing Sweden to avoid arrest hack89 Dec 2014 #189
Charges, this is about charges that were never filed, about a case that never existed. So sabrina 1 Dec 2014 #193
So you are saying Assange's lawyer lied under oath? hack89 Dec 2014 #195
Chomsky is a traitor and should be executed!!1!! BeanMusical Nov 2014 #9
They had a good month. ucrdem Nov 2014 #17
Boy is it easy to distract Americans from what really matters... NoJusticeNoPeace Nov 2014 #29
Bravo to both. K&R Tierra_y_Libertad Nov 2014 #30
What I learned from this: rape is OK, provided you exposed US state secrets. Donald Ian Rankin Nov 2014 #36
This message was self-deleted by its author 1000words Nov 2014 #39
Your loss. N.T. Donald Ian Rankin Nov 2014 #40
Post removed Post removed Nov 2014 #52
Supporting rapists is not a liberal position. N.T. Donald Ian Rankin Nov 2014 #54
+1...nt SidDithers Nov 2014 #59
False accusations of rape are exceedingly rare YoungDemCA Nov 2014 #75
Assange admitted it. joshcryer Nov 2014 #81
Exactly... SidDithers Nov 2014 #147
Now the brits have spent 10m Pounds to arrest him for questioning in a supposed Swedish sex crime. pa28 Nov 2014 #43
Well, if it's a "supposed" sex crime, that makes all the difference... brooklynite Nov 2014 #50
When was last time a government spent 10m to extradite somebody for questioning in a sex case? pa28 Nov 2014 #55
I wasn't aware that criminal investigations came with a budget... brooklynite Nov 2014 #56
He's a fugitive under British law, subject to British penalties. Should they forget him? nt msanthrope Nov 2014 #73
People granted political asylum are by definition labeled as "fugitives". pa28 Nov 2014 #93
He's a bail jumper. Should people on bail in the UK be allowed to skip merely msanthrope Nov 2014 #94
Criminals can't just walk into an embassy for legal relief. pa28 Nov 2014 #96
You think politics doesn't trump logic and common sense? randome Nov 2014 #97
I do and I believe I pointed that out upthread. pa28 Nov 2014 #99
He wasn't granted an asylum recognized by any cogent legal authority. And, as a criminal msanthrope Nov 2014 #98
He is actually a fugitive from British justice hack89 Nov 2014 #71
+1 YoungDemCA Nov 2014 #84
Assange asked for and received asylum from the government of Ecuador. pa28 Nov 2014 #89
Too bad diplomatic asylum is not recognized by international law hack89 Nov 2014 #90
Chomsky is awesome! He's also an example of why we need university tenure Wella Nov 2014 #47
... SidDithers Nov 2014 #48
I don't give a shite who hangs out with this asshole.. "Julian Assange Backs Ron and Rand Paul".. Cha Nov 2014 #68
I think ucrdem Nov 2014 #72
2 good men. I applaud them both! nt elias49 Nov 2014 #74
How is Assange remotely a "good man"? YoungDemCA Nov 2014 #76
Well there's Wikileaks...heard of it? nt elias49 Nov 2014 #78
Yes, and that doesn't negate the likelihood that he's a scumbag rapist YoungDemCA Nov 2014 #80
Post removed Post removed Nov 2014 #83
And now you show your true colors YoungDemCA Nov 2014 #85
What colors are you talking about? elias49 Nov 2014 #86
Can't trust those chicks- they'll fuck you over in a heartbeat hack89 Nov 2014 #87
7-0 Hide..... msanthrope Nov 2014 #91
Excellent hide....nt SidDithers Nov 2014 #109
Thank you. nt msanthrope Nov 2014 #124
That's what the CIA said. Octafish Nov 2014 #105
Oh so the CIA said it, then it must be wrong YoungDemCA Nov 2014 #113
CIA and Cuba are cause for dismantling the Agency. Octafish Nov 2014 #116
Oh dear...you are sourcing Israel Shamir, aren't you?? nt msanthrope Nov 2014 #126
Better than CURVEBALL. Octafish Nov 2014 #127
+1 Luis Posada Carriles was a member of a very special group nationalize the fed Nov 2014 #129
Los Amigos Terroristas de Bush Octafish Nov 2014 #138
Daniel fucking Hopsicker!!.... SidDithers Nov 2014 #140
Isreal Shamir works for Wikileaks, and is a noted Holocaust denier. Any DUer who wishes to know msanthrope Nov 2014 #130
Wow. zappaman Nov 2014 #132
Just another smear from zappaman. Octafish Nov 2014 #139
Reply #142. zappaman Nov 2014 #150
Yup. All the articles posted from Paul Craig Roberts support your assertion... SidDithers Nov 2014 #142
Supporting holocaust deniers is disgusting. zappaman Nov 2014 #152
And now he's calling a banned anti-Semite a "great DUer"... SidDithers Nov 2014 #154
It does make one wonder, don't it? zappaman Nov 2014 #155
Yet, what he wrote about Assange's accusers is true. Octafish Nov 2014 #137
So you support a holocaust denier? zappaman Nov 2014 #151
A troll banned for being an anti-Semite is a "great DUer"?... SidDithers Nov 2014 #153
I'm kind of surprised sharp_stick Nov 2014 #156
You are citing a DUer banned for Holocaust denial to prove that the Holocaust denier msanthrope Nov 2014 #158
That is not what I wrote. Octafish Nov 2014 #159
You are citing Israel Shamir. He is a noted Holocaust denier. One of the "great DUers" you msanthrope Nov 2014 #160
Not the only Holocaust denier he cites either. zappaman Nov 2014 #162
Lie down with dogs, don't be surprised when the fleas bite you in the ass. nt msanthrope Nov 2014 #163
... zappaman Nov 2014 #164
How am I supposed to know everyone banned and for what? Octafish Nov 2014 #165
Well....now that you know that Israel Shamir is a Holocaust denier and Wikileaks employee, and msanthrope Nov 2014 #167
You linked specifically to a troll banned for being an anti-Semite. zappaman Nov 2014 #161
Smear artist. Octafish Nov 2014 #166
No smears necessary to show you linked to an anti-Semitic banned troll. zappaman Nov 2014 #168
it's in their profile tammywammy Nov 2014 #169
Shhhhhh zappaman Nov 2014 #170
How do you know who has been banned for what? It's on their profile. nt msanthrope Dec 2014 #174
Banned anti-semite trolls are now "great DUers". zappaman Dec 2014 #180
Assange...like Officer Wilson, need not answer for his crimes. nt msanthrope Dec 2014 #181
Some of these responses downthread are hilarious...... marmar Nov 2014 #103
Sheer hypocrisy. Tierra_y_Libertad Nov 2014 #106
They can be discussed without defending a rapist/predator YoungDemCA Nov 2014 #114
Don't forget "In no known universe can Chomsky or Assage represent in any Puglover Nov 2014 #121
That is the second greatest thread in DU history. n/t QC Nov 2014 #122
And NOONE needs to apologize for the Puglover Nov 2014 #123
Nope. No need to be an apologist, that's for sure. n/t QC Nov 2014 #125
How exciting! Assange appears on balcony! With Chomsky! Someone snaps a photo! struggle4progress Nov 2014 #111
LOL! zappaman Nov 2014 #112
Heheh... SidDithers Nov 2014 #120
I've been simultaneously bored and face palming reading this thread until now Number23 Nov 2014 #128
lol treestar Nov 2014 #143
You just redeemed this thread for me (nt) Recursion Dec 2014 #178
And, predictably, the smear/propaganda machine is on the job. woo me with science Nov 2014 #134
... SidDithers Nov 2014 #136
Julian has indeed save the world treestar Nov 2014 #144
Excellent post, thank you. As for the smear campaign, lol, same old names wherever you go. Same sabrina 1 Nov 2014 #145
It's telling that Assange refuses to face charges in Sweden YoungDemCA Nov 2014 #149
When you find yourself on the WRONG side of Assange and Chomsky... bvar22 Nov 2014 #157
They are on the wrong side of rape. nt msanthrope Dec 2014 #177
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Assange and Chomsky Appea...»Reply #138