General Discussion

Tierra_y_Libertad

(50,414 posts)

11. I agree. If it comes down to a fight for the "middle" she's in trouble.

Sun Nov 30, 2014, 01:27 PM

Nov 2014

If it's Bush or Romney or some other "moderate" she'll have to rely on money more than issues. And, she'll have to run even more to the right. She has a lot of money, and monied interests on her side, but the Republicans will have more. If she moves to far to the right she'll lose the support of the activists and left wing of the party and public.

If it's "moderate" against "moderate" she can expect a low voter turnout because the best she will have to offer is "not as bad" and "more of the same".

And, there is the fear factor. The Republicans fear Hillary more than the Democrats and independents (the largest voting block) fear Romney or Bush. They will turn out because of that fear. The independents, mostly moderate, will flip a coin or decide that some change is needed.

Of course, there is a very good chance that the Republicans will run one of the crazies and scare the voters into voting against the Republicans if not for for Hillary and give her the election.

The people are weary of the way things are now. They want a change. The Republicans can run on "change"by just being Republicans. What can Hillary run on following a Democratic Centrist president as a Democratic Centrist herself? Change? From what to what?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

43 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Hillary Clinton has a very tricky needle to thread [View all] cali Nov 2014 OP

I'll take crap for this, but I think a good share of America wants a white man back in charge. CrispyQ Nov 2014 #1

I agree. That's part of what I meant by a reactionary electorate cali Nov 2014 #2

Romney , imho, only polls well because of buyers remorse DemocratSinceBirth Nov 2014 #3

possibly, but that doesn't mean that that itself couldn't be something that worked in his favor cali Nov 2014 #6

She is a turnoff to the younger 50% of voters. NYC_SKP Nov 2014 #4

True - could mean a very low turnout if she's the nominee. polichick Nov 2014 #40

She loves war, and war criminals. Those are disqualifiers for me. Scuba Nov 2014 #5

In truth, so does every candidate for President. MineralMan Nov 2014 #7

I disagree. I think she has some unique challenges cali Nov 2014 #9

I know you disagree. You tell us so frequently. MineralMan Nov 2014 #13

True but since most of us vote, cali can sway people on DU so no this is a good place Rex Nov 2014 #14

Most DUers will vote for the Democratic nominee. MineralMan Nov 2014 #19

I'm not concerned at all, just pointing out that people can be swayed to vote Rex Nov 2014 #24

That's certainly true. As I have said a number of times, if Bernie Sanders or MineralMan Nov 2014 #28

True, I don't know if we will even have another viable candidate. Rex Nov 2014 #31

I see 2016 as yet another transitional election. MineralMan Nov 2014 #33

are you confused, MM? do you realize cali Nov 2014 #22

I'm not telling you what to post or not post, Cali. MineralMan Nov 2014 #27

See, you were very well reasoned until THAT comment wyldwolf Nov 2014 #36

Agree Bagsgroove Nov 2014 #12

Clinton fatique aspirant Nov 2014 #8

Though it is not we have already handed Hillary a victory it is really Hillary's to lose Thinkingabout Nov 2014 #10

reducing the damage and continuing threat of corporate influence and control cali Nov 2014 #17

cali, what I am trying to call your attention is the 90% dors not have the funds to Thinkingabout Nov 2014 #29

just because you benefited from a corporation, hardly makes the encroachment cali Nov 2014 #34

so you are saying Warren got campaign money from corporations and she does not have ties Thinkingabout Nov 2014 #35

absolutely. she does not have the history with corporations and Wall Street that Hillary does cali Nov 2014 #37

Okay, she admitted where she got money and she does have connections. Thinkingabout Nov 2014 #38

I agree. If it comes down to a fight for the "middle" she's in trouble. Tierra_y_Libertad Nov 2014 #11

Nice! Bagsgroove Nov 2014 #23

Good defense, huh Thinkingabout Nov 2014 #32

She is not a shoe in, much to the chargin of some here. Rex Nov 2014 #15

Hillary's not stressin' nt BootinUp Nov 2014 #16

How do you know? cali Nov 2014 #18

Its a gift I have. BootinUp Nov 2014 #20

Agreed. And that white working class vote she needs sure as hell aren't living in 2008. hedda_foil Nov 2014 #21

Ensorcelled. One of my favorite words. cali Nov 2014 #26

Indeed, Warren can and probably will ensorcell a great many of them. NYC_SKP Nov 2014 #41

All your concerns are why I won't support her through the Cleita Nov 2014 #25

I'm going to disagree with you about one factor here. Savannahmann Nov 2014 #30

They talk about polls TBF Nov 2014 #39

Here's where you're mistaken Proud Public Servant Nov 2014 #42

NO.MORE.BOOMERS. GeorgeGist Nov 2014 #43