General Discussion

wyldwolf

(43,891 posts)

36. See, you were very well reasoned until THAT comment

Reply to cali (Reply #9)

Sun Nov 30, 2014, 02:39 PM

Nov 2014

Then you let your obvious bias show.

http://www1.macys.com/shop/luggage?id=16908

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

43 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Hillary Clinton has a very tricky needle to thread [View all] cali Nov 2014 OP

I'll take crap for this, but I think a good share of America wants a white man back in charge. CrispyQ Nov 2014 #1

I agree. That's part of what I meant by a reactionary electorate cali Nov 2014 #2

Romney , imho, only polls well because of buyers remorse DemocratSinceBirth Nov 2014 #3

possibly, but that doesn't mean that that itself couldn't be something that worked in his favor cali Nov 2014 #6

She is a turnoff to the younger 50% of voters. NYC_SKP Nov 2014 #4

True - could mean a very low turnout if she's the nominee. polichick Nov 2014 #40

She loves war, and war criminals. Those are disqualifiers for me. Scuba Nov 2014 #5

In truth, so does every candidate for President. MineralMan Nov 2014 #7

I disagree. I think she has some unique challenges cali Nov 2014 #9

I know you disagree. You tell us so frequently. MineralMan Nov 2014 #13

True but since most of us vote, cali can sway people on DU so no this is a good place Rex Nov 2014 #14

Most DUers will vote for the Democratic nominee. MineralMan Nov 2014 #19

I'm not concerned at all, just pointing out that people can be swayed to vote Rex Nov 2014 #24

That's certainly true. As I have said a number of times, if Bernie Sanders or MineralMan Nov 2014 #28

True, I don't know if we will even have another viable candidate. Rex Nov 2014 #31

I see 2016 as yet another transitional election. MineralMan Nov 2014 #33

are you confused, MM? do you realize cali Nov 2014 #22

I'm not telling you what to post or not post, Cali. MineralMan Nov 2014 #27

See, you were very well reasoned until THAT comment wyldwolf Nov 2014 #36

Agree Bagsgroove Nov 2014 #12

Clinton fatique aspirant Nov 2014 #8

Though it is not we have already handed Hillary a victory it is really Hillary's to lose Thinkingabout Nov 2014 #10

reducing the damage and continuing threat of corporate influence and control cali Nov 2014 #17

cali, what I am trying to call your attention is the 90% dors not have the funds to Thinkingabout Nov 2014 #29

just because you benefited from a corporation, hardly makes the encroachment cali Nov 2014 #34

so you are saying Warren got campaign money from corporations and she does not have ties Thinkingabout Nov 2014 #35

absolutely. she does not have the history with corporations and Wall Street that Hillary does cali Nov 2014 #37

Okay, she admitted where she got money and she does have connections. Thinkingabout Nov 2014 #38

I agree. If it comes down to a fight for the "middle" she's in trouble. Tierra_y_Libertad Nov 2014 #11

Nice! Bagsgroove Nov 2014 #23

Good defense, huh Thinkingabout Nov 2014 #32

She is not a shoe in, much to the chargin of some here. Rex Nov 2014 #15

Hillary's not stressin' nt BootinUp Nov 2014 #16

How do you know? cali Nov 2014 #18

Its a gift I have. BootinUp Nov 2014 #20

Agreed. And that white working class vote she needs sure as hell aren't living in 2008. hedda_foil Nov 2014 #21

Ensorcelled. One of my favorite words. cali Nov 2014 #26

Indeed, Warren can and probably will ensorcell a great many of them. NYC_SKP Nov 2014 #41

All your concerns are why I won't support her through the Cleita Nov 2014 #25

I'm going to disagree with you about one factor here. Savannahmann Nov 2014 #30

They talk about polls TBF Nov 2014 #39

Here's where you're mistaken Proud Public Servant Nov 2014 #42

NO.MORE.BOOMERS. GeorgeGist Nov 2014 #43