Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Executive Order on Police Militarization [View all]woo me with science
(32,139 posts)42. Thank you. More corporate messaging to normalize the unconscionable.
Offering just cameras as a solution is absurd. We are continually propagandized by the corporate message machine to accept what has been done to this country as a "new normal"....
...whether it is mass surveillance, the impoverishment of our middle class and replacement of careers with with low-wage service jobs...and obscenely militarized police forces.
It's not acceptable. It's not anything that should be considered "normal" in the United States of America.
The constant stream of military equipment and training into our civilian police forces is not acceptable by any stretch of the imagination, and this constant, tacit message that we have no right to expect its actual reversal should outrage every American.
The militarization ITSELF needs to be stopped and reversed.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=5896784
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
59 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Didn't it used to? I wonder if the National Guard is still getting it or if police departments are
ChisolmTrailDem
Dec 2014
#3
Well as most National Guards are decimated....I think the police....because it suits
VanillaRhapsody
Dec 2014
#4
Yup, better to have that equipment bearing down on the populace than to have it collecting
ChisolmTrailDem
Dec 2014
#7
I am speaking from what I have heard about them....that the economy has adverselly effected
VanillaRhapsody
Dec 2014
#25
THAT's the part that scares US.....why we want the National Guard to do that job...NOT Police
VanillaRhapsody
Dec 2014
#27
I absolutely agree. But this OP says that Pres Obama wants to "track" the equipment.
rhett o rick
Dec 2014
#56
Wont this thrill the teaparty who are all certain that the federal govt is collecting weapons to
NoJusticeNoPeace
Dec 2014
#5
ayep. The loons will all screech that ..here it is, see weTOLDYOU this is what he would do...
Volaris
Dec 2014
#16
The TeaBaggers will laugh at this. The Pres isn't going to curtail the weapon sales, he is merely
rhett o rick
Dec 2014
#52
Adding congrats on 20K posts, m'dear. Also, that equipment needs to be in the Nat'l Guard Armory...
Hekate
Dec 2014
#6
Yes, I get your point about an SU invasion, it's your avatar which I have always loved.
sheshe2
Dec 2014
#12
I don't think it was edited out. These are two separate pictures. The pic up top is when more guys
okaawhatever
Dec 2014
#38
So did you notice what the action the President is taking with this Exec Order? TRACKING
rhett o rick
Dec 2014
#53
For what? For demanding that we start " better track[ing] the weapons"? What will tracking
rhett o rick
Dec 2014
#57
Sadly this is the Obama I voted for also. He didn't say he would do anything but "track".
rhett o rick
Dec 2014
#58
Fuck some better tracking and reviews STOP THE FLOW OF THE HARDWARE AND REPO what is out there.
TheKentuckian
Dec 2014
#41
Thank you. More corporate messaging to normalize the unconscionable.
woo me with science
Dec 2014
#42
But sheshe this exec order accomplishes nothing. Zero, zilch. As CIC why doesn't he simply
rhett o rick
Dec 2014
#54
The entire Democratic leadership opposed Grayson amendment to stop arming cops with DOD weapons
woo me with science
Dec 2014
#45
Can you spell Bull Shit? This is more rhetoric. What action will be taken? More tracking?
rhett o rick
Dec 2014
#51