Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

zipplewrath

(16,698 posts)

2. Probably need to establish the methodology.

Reply to applegrove (Original post)

Mon Dec 1, 2014, 10:34 PM

Dec 2014

In order to sway a future court, one probably needs to develop a fairly robust process for this evaluation. I'd suspect that literally thousands of these permutations would have to be run and the results would have to be lower than 5%.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

8 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

If The Supreme Court Reads This Study, It Could End Partisan Gerrymandering Forever [View all] applegrove Dec 2014 OP

n/t blkmusclmachine Dec 2014 #1

Probably need to establish the methodology. zipplewrath Dec 2014 #2

Do the 5 SC Deciders even read anything other than supportive of their opinion? Dont call me Shirley Dec 2014 #3

the only way the SCOTUS would "end gerrymandering" as a result of this study 0rganism Dec 2014 #4

The SCotUS *reads*?!1 nt UTUSN Dec 2014 #5

"Uh-huh-huh, uh, huh-huh-huh mindwalker_i Dec 2014 #6

If no standard is in place... Takket Dec 2014 #7

If present trends continue ... JEFF9K Dec 2014 #8