Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

TheWraith

(24,331 posts)

5. We are, which is why the F-35 is likely to be axed before it sees mass production.

Reply to Cooley Hurd (Reply #1)

Fri Apr 20, 2012, 06:13 PM

Apr 2012

Although frankly it was silly trying to build a "half stealth" airplane in the first place: technology far enough back from the cutting edge to sell to other countries, but also far enough back to not be truly effective in providing a zero-presence profile. Investing in a few more F-22s and a refurbished design of the F/A-18 would have made more sense to begin with.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

9 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

What do we get for $90 million EACH? The F-35. Step into the cockpit: [View all] trof Apr 2012 OP

You have to admit, trof, that's a helluva aiplane... Cooley Hurd Apr 2012 #1

We are, which is why the F-35 is likely to be axed before it sees mass production. TheWraith Apr 2012 #5

One trillion dollars. CaliforniaPeggy Apr 2012 #2

Bet death to win, place and show! gratuitous Apr 2012 #3

I just watched a fascinating NOVA program on this last night. cbayer Apr 2012 #4

When you are targeting "Terrorists" with their families in their homes, RC Apr 2012 #6

We do not need ANY new weapons systems........ Swede Atlanta Apr 2012 #7

this plane is worse than the F-18 it's replacing. provis99 Apr 2012 #8

real target = US treasury to fatten MIC corporate profits nt msongs Apr 2012 #9