Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: It's amazing to me, how many ... [View all]calimary
(90,200 posts)149. Hey, I was angry about the OJ verdict, and believe me - I am FURIOUS about this one!
This was SO damn slanted and biased - from the get-go. They went all out to make sure this murder would walk free. That grand jury was a joke. That entire "examination" of the "facts" was a fraud. Only one side was presented. At least there WAS a prosecution in the OJ case - even while completely and ridiculously bungled. Here? There wasn't even a prosecution. The prosecutor was protecting the perpetrator. And there was NO ONE speaking for the victim. This was more one-sided than mitch mcconnell.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
168 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Really? How would you know? I'm enraged over BOTH. And both DW and OJ are GUILTY.
WinkyDink
Dec 2014
#62
my guess--and it's just a guess-- is that his football stardom outweighed his skin color
BlancheSplanchnik
Dec 2014
#133
Hey, I was angry about the OJ verdict, and believe me - I am FURIOUS about this one!
calimary
Dec 2014
#149
The you must have loved the Medical Examiner saying that Wilson must be telling the
NoJusticeNoPeace
Dec 2014
#32
And when they allegedly corrected that error of the statute they did NOT point out to the
NoJusticeNoPeace
Dec 2014
#43
Does every law enforcement training program say the officer is to empty his weapon
Bandit
Dec 2014
#18
Sounds like we have allowed police to become judge, jury and executioner...This is not a
NoJusticeNoPeace
Dec 2014
#35
"And then he changed the subject" - that is a truly sad vignette you depict, especially
KingCharlemagne
Dec 2014
#150
The evidence they did not get was in the package but the prosecutor told the GJ that these
jwirr
Dec 2014
#20
A prosecutor needs to consider what he can use in court if an indictment is handed down.
badtoworse
Dec 2014
#120
Unfortunately for justice - McCulloch considered anything that he did not agree with as tainted. We
jwirr
Dec 2014
#123
On that I agree that if true they would be really bad for any case. Unfortunately the prosecution
jwirr
Dec 2014
#127
I don't disagree with most of what you posted, but I think there is more to it.
badtoworse
Dec 2014
#106
No intention to be insulting or patronizing and I apologize if I came off that way.
badtoworse
Dec 2014
#114
And then don't forget his assistant gave them the wrong law to use in this case and did not make a
jwirr
Dec 2014
#124
The central thing that has bugged me about this GJ presentation all along: why the fuck
KingCharlemagne
Dec 2014
#151
You are mistaken. The grand jury was not asked whether "a crime could possibly have been committed".
Nye Bevan
Dec 2014
#50
Many DUers have stated that the prosecutor should have selectively presented cherry-picked evidence
Nye Bevan
Dec 2014
#46
They handed the jurors a statute that said it was legal for a cop to shoot a fleeing suspect
BrotherIvan
Dec 2014
#47
So the correct version of the law was presented to the grand jurors before the deliberations began.
Nye Bevan
Dec 2014
#52
Can you link us to where it was explained to the GJ what the mistake was?
NoJusticeNoPeace
Dec 2014
#54
Yeap, they're even criminalizing the 12yr old kids who was murdered parents!!!!!
uponit7771
Dec 2014
#87
I have posted that question before,but I have never gotten a legal expert's answer.
mainstreetonce
Dec 2014
#38
I am not a lawyer, but it is my understanding that the GJ is not a judgement to be
logosoco
Dec 2014
#44