Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

JI7

(93,708 posts)
13. this is Misleading
Tue Dec 2, 2014, 07:28 PM
Dec 2014

Porn studios in the UK have to submit their DVDs to a certification body to receive an R18 rating. That comes from the same censorship body that oversees Hollywood movie releases in the UK: The British Board of Film Classification. The main change that has taken place is that the BBFC is now going to require paid-for online porn to adhere to the same guidelines as DVDs.

The Independent has published a list of sex acts which it claims are now banned in porn. This list includes spanking, caning, whipping, strangulation, fisting and physical abuse.

But the thing is, there isn't a blanket ban on these sex acts. Here's a quote from Murray Perkins, who works at the BBFC, that explains what they actually do when it comes to porn:

"Sex work shouldn’t be in breach of the criminal law; participants must be adults; it shouldn’t encourage an interest in sexually abusive activity — rape or child abuse; it should be consensual; there’s limited scope for role play; but it should be non-harmful and there shouldn’t be any infliction of pain beyond mild consensual activity. Strong sexual threats or abuse are unlikely to be acceptable."

What Perkins is explaining here is that the BBFC is actually pretty relaxed when it comes to porn. There's still a thriving porn industry in the UK, after all. What the board does frown upon, though, is anything that's physically harmful or injurious.

Take, for example, spanking. That hasn't been banned. It's still allowed, as long as it's not seen to be causing harm. The same goes for caning, whipping, strangulation and all of the other sex acts outlined above.


Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/uk-law-bans-types-of-porn-2014-12#ixzz3KmnNBRaW

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

That is so, so wrong. True Blue Door Dec 2014 #1
My first thought. hifiguy Dec 2014 #6
So if a real female police officer is arresting someone True Blue Door Dec 2014 #9
The complications are going to be endless. hifiguy Dec 2014 #11
The consequences will never be the same. AngryAmish Dec 2014 #36
I prefer getting my butt beat by brushes and paddles. True Blue Door Dec 2014 #12
To each their own. hifiguy Dec 2014 #15
Tanya, the Lotus Eater! Turbineguy Dec 2014 #22
All that stuff is for deviants, freaks and weirdos anyway... Blue_Tires Dec 2014 #23
It's only deviant or weird cloudbase Dec 2014 #38
The deviants, freaks, and weirdos who have banned it. True Blue Door Dec 2014 #40
I am not going to touch this olddots Dec 2014 #2
That's what she said. True Blue Door Dec 2014 #7
Should be entertaining neverforget Dec 2014 #3
For this to get more interesting, you have to take an interest. True Blue Door Dec 2014 #14
The women of the Castle Anthrax will be very disappointed VScott Dec 2014 #4
i remember watching that movie as a kid... Takket Dec 2014 #31
Bad, evil, naughty Zoot! True Blue Door Dec 2014 #42
I also thought of deutsey Dec 2014 #44
Not surprised, they have a Big Brother mindset there dissentient Dec 2014 #5
what could possibly be the objection to female ejaculation La Lioness Priyanka Dec 2014 #8
That certainly seems to be the odd one out. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Dec 2014 #30
Well, if she is in the Colossus of Rhodes position... Eleanors38 Dec 2014 #34
We fought a war so we wouldn't have to pay any attention to the British. NaturalHigh Dec 2014 #10
this is Misleading JI7 Dec 2014 #13
Working for the certification board must be an, err, hifiguy Dec 2014 #16
Ahhhh - The human version of "No animals have been harmed in the making of this movie" TexasMommaWithAHat Dec 2014 #17
yes, it's something they already have with dvds but now it covers paid for online porn also JI7 Dec 2014 #20
Female ejaculation is harmful? LittleBlue Dec 2014 #18
they didn't ban it, as i said, the article in the OP is misleading JI7 Dec 2014 #19
Strange, then, that every other news source contradicts that one LittleBlue Dec 2014 #24
click bait JI7 Dec 2014 #25
Can cause a slippery floor hazard? Nye Bevan Dec 2014 #21
Some might call it a slippery slope? tritsofme Dec 2014 #32
Damn! What is this world cumming to!! madinmaryland Dec 2014 #26
Jeez, What's Left? CBGLuthier Dec 2014 #27
Thank goodness it doesn't affect written works Prophet 451 Dec 2014 #28
"Feminist-centric dominatrix porn?" LongTomH Dec 2014 #29
Sounds like an intcredibly boring dominatrix. True Blue Door Dec 2014 #41
Odd. I no desire to consume porn . . . Brigid Dec 2014 #33
Face sitting is bad? joeglow3 Dec 2014 #35
Brits iz weird AndreaCG Dec 2014 #37
If I can be forgiven for misquoting the denizens of Sesame Street: LeftyMom Dec 2014 #39
SPANKING????? Derek V Dec 2014 #43
Wholesome activities like face sitting? Warren DeMontague Dec 2014 #45
ridiculous PaulBrown Dec 2014 #46
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»UK Prudes Ban Spanking, S...»Reply #13