Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)ThinkProgress: How One Woman Could Hit The Reset Button In The Case Against Darren Wilson [View all]
http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2014/12/02/3598082/one-woman-could-appoint-a-special-prosecutor-and-bring-justice-to-ferguson/<snip>
There is a provision of Missouri Law MO Rev Stat § 56.110 that empowers the court having criminal jurisdiction to appoint some other attorney to prosecute if the prosecuting attorney be interested. (The term be interested is an awkward legal way to refer to conflict-of-interest or bias. The statute dates from the turn of the 20th century.)
The court with jurisdiction over Darren Wilsons case is the 21st Judicial Circuit Court of Missouri. That means the power to appoint a special prosecutor is held by Maura McShane, the Presiding Judge of the 21st Circuit.
Missouri courts, at times, have interpreted their power to appoint a special prosecutor broadly, to include not only blatant conflicts like the prosecutor being related to the defendant but also subtler conflicts that reveal themselves through the prosecutors conduct in the case.
In the 1996 case of State v. Copeland, a Missouri court replaced the prosecutor because the judge sensed that [the prosecutors] sympathies for [the defendant] may have prevented him from being an effective advocate for the state. The judge found the adversarial process to have broken down in that [the prosecutor] appeared to be advocating the defendants position.
<snip>
There is a provision of Missouri Law MO Rev Stat § 56.110 that empowers the court having criminal jurisdiction to appoint some other attorney to prosecute if the prosecuting attorney be interested. (The term be interested is an awkward legal way to refer to conflict-of-interest or bias. The statute dates from the turn of the 20th century.)
The court with jurisdiction over Darren Wilsons case is the 21st Judicial Circuit Court of Missouri. That means the power to appoint a special prosecutor is held by Maura McShane, the Presiding Judge of the 21st Circuit.
Missouri courts, at times, have interpreted their power to appoint a special prosecutor broadly, to include not only blatant conflicts like the prosecutor being related to the defendant but also subtler conflicts that reveal themselves through the prosecutors conduct in the case.
In the 1996 case of State v. Copeland, a Missouri court replaced the prosecutor because the judge sensed that [the prosecutors] sympathies for [the defendant] may have prevented him from being an effective advocate for the state. The judge found the adversarial process to have broken down in that [the prosecutor] appeared to be advocating the defendants position.
<snip>
62 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
ThinkProgress: How One Woman Could Hit The Reset Button In The Case Against Darren Wilson [View all]
Fumesucker
Dec 2014
OP
I don't read it to say that Wilson had to have been arrested before the court
rhett o rick
Dec 2014
#39
So How Do We Put Pressure On Maura McShane To Appoint A Special Prosecutor?.....
global1
Dec 2014
#3
Much as I despise MO Governor Jay Nixon, the article does him a dis-service when it
KingCharlemagne
Dec 2014
#4
I don't doubt that we won't see any action from the Conservatively run DoJ. nm
rhett o rick
Dec 2014
#48
If the DOJ had the evidence for a federal indictment, a case would quickly follow.
branford
Dec 2014
#49
I don't buy that shit for a minute. Reading the transcript shows that this case
rhett o rick
Dec 2014
#51
If you can't recognize the hand of the Oligarch Rulers in this, then we are on
rhett o rick
Dec 2014
#61
Thanks for that review. You listed three possible conflicts McCullough has. There is another
sabrina 1
Dec 2014
#58
St. Louis prosecutor Bob McCulloch should be charged with accessory to murder after the fact
nakocal
Dec 2014
#6
The grand jury saw all of the evidence and concluded that there wasn't even probable cause,
Nye Bevan
Dec 2014
#17
Physical evidence doesn't have to give a reason for Wilson to get out of the car
Lee-Lee
Dec 2014
#53
In short: this case is an absolute trainwreck and would inevitably end in acquittal.
Nye Bevan
Dec 2014
#16
Yeah, dont pick at that scab, might find some real ugly shit underneath it, like a murder.
NoJusticeNoPeace
Dec 2014
#28
Even if negligence or intent can be shown, no cop can ever be held civilly liable?
NoJusticeNoPeace
Dec 2014
#29