Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
4. A couple of points:
Fri Apr 20, 2012, 10:03 PM
Apr 2012

The repeal of Glass-Steagall and the Commodity Futures Modernization Act, both facilitated by Phil Gramm, led to the crisis.

Glass-Steagall was about separating commercial banking from investment banking:

  • Banking Act of 1933 (P.L. 73-66, 48 STAT. 162).
    Also known as the Glass-Steagall Act. Established the FDIC as a temporary agency. Separated commercial banking from investment banking, establishing them as separate lines of commerce.
http://www.fdic.gov/regulations/laws/important/index.html


Commodity Futures Modernization Act of 2000

The Commodity Futures Modernization Act of 2000 (CFMA) is United States federal legislation that officially ensured the deregulation of financial products known as over-the-counter derivatives. It was signed into law on December 21, 2000 by President Bill Clinton. It clarified the law so that most over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives transactions between “sophisticated parties” would not be regulated as “futures” under the Commodity Exchange Act of 1936 (CEA) or as “securities” under the federal securities laws. Instead, the major dealers of those products (banks and securities firms) would continue to have their dealings in OTC derivatives supervised by their federal regulators under general “safety and soundness” standards. The Commodity Futures Trading Commission's (CFTC) desire to have “Functional regulation” of the market was also rejected. Instead, the CFTC would continue to do “entity-based supervision of OTC derivatives dealers.” [1] These derivatives, especially the credit default swap, would be at the heart of the financial crisis of 2008 and the subsequent Great Recession.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commodity_Futures_Modernization_Act_of_2000


The Gramm connection

Aha: the Politico notices that Phil Gramm, McCain’s economic guru, can also be viewed as the father of the financial crisis.

The general co-chairman of John McCain’s presidential campaign, former Sen. Phil Gramm (R-Texas), led the charge in 1999 to repeal a Depression-era banking regulation law that Democrat Barack Obama claimed on Thursday contributed significantly to today’s economic turmoil.

….

According to federal lobbying disclosure records, Gramm lobbied Congress, the Federal Reserve and Treasury Department about banking and mortgage issues in 2005 and 2006.

During those years, the mortgage industry pressed Congress to roll back strong state rules that sought to stem the rise of predatory tactics used by lenders and brokers to place homeowners in high-cost mortgages

Where have I seen that before? Ah:

His chief economic adviser is former Senator Phil Gramm, a fervent advocate of financial deregulation. In fact, I’d argue that aside from Alan Greenspan, nobody did as much as Mr. Gramm to make this crisis possible.

Seriously, the Gramm connection tells you all you need to know about where a McCain administration would stand on financial issues: squarely against any significant reform.

http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/03/29/the-gramm-connection/


The Volcker rule reinstated the separation of commercial and investment banking:

<...>

The Volcker Rule was one of the most important reforms of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010. It prohibits federally insured banks from engaging in proprietary trading, participating in complex securitizations, owning hedge funds or private equity funds, or engaging in any other high-risk activities. It also prohibits banks from taking actions that conflict with the interests of their customers.

The public comment window for the rule ended on Feb. 13. The Securities and Exchange Commission alone received more than 18,000 comments, more than 15,700 of which came from Public Citizen members and supporters. Legislators submitted 17 separate letters signed by 172 members asking for changes that would weaken the rule. Three letters signed by 20 members recommended steps to strengthen it.

http://www.citizen.org/pressroom/pressroomredirect.cfm?ID=3570

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Bless your heart.. Fumesucker Apr 2012 #1
One down. Once again - how did the repeal of G-S cause Lehman to fail? banned from Kos Apr 2012 #3
I don't know and I don't care.. Fumesucker Apr 2012 #7
The repeal of GS led to too big to fail banks being in jeopardy of failing karynnj Apr 2012 #66
It seems very unlikely that you have $1000. ( n/t ) Make7 Apr 2012 #2
A couple of points: ProSense Apr 2012 #4
Which has exactly NOTHING to do with Lehman's failure. banned from Kos Apr 2012 #6
Really? ProSense Apr 2012 #8
No, your premise is wrong. The economy was never "shielded from I-bank risks" banned from Kos Apr 2012 #11
Again ProSense Apr 2012 #15
What? jsmirman Apr 2012 #36
Lehman was destroyed by the collapse of the subprime mortgage market jsmirman Apr 2012 #5
Garbage - Countrywide, IndyMac, WaMu and 100s others sourced loans banned from Kos Apr 2012 #10
Welcher jsmirman Apr 2012 #16
Are you Charles Keating? Octafish Apr 2012 #9
Question?.....Credit rating agencies.... lostnote12 Apr 2012 #25
Guard-Dogs for the Banks: The Case Against Rating Agencies Octafish Apr 2012 #33
very nice article...thanks...n/p lostnote12 Apr 2012 #39
His check is in the mail along with Ichingcarpenter Apr 2012 #63
The crooks get away with looting the economy and the Treasury. Octafish Apr 2012 #64
If I answer... can you send it to Elizabeth Warren's campaign instead? nt MannyGoldstein Apr 2012 #12
I'll try, but I don't have patience for long posts. Lucky Luciano Apr 2012 #13
Agreed MannyGoldstein Apr 2012 #14
Also very true jsmirman Apr 2012 #17
That is absolute garbage! LEH and BSC failed because of FORECLOSURES & BAD LOANS! banned from Kos Apr 2012 #18
And were they unable to pay their mortgages MannyGoldstein Apr 2012 #19
What the hell are you talking about? jsmirman Apr 2012 #20
Their balance sheet was corrupted because of debtors who did not make payments! banned from Kos Apr 2012 #22
Were there more subprime loans MannyGoldstein Apr 2012 #23
Absolutely! And mortgage originators steered naive people into subprime banned from Kos Apr 2012 #29
Were loans like that widely available prior to the early 2000s? nt MannyGoldstein Apr 2012 #31
What the hell is your point? jsmirman Apr 2012 #26
People do often say "levering up" etc. I say it all the time Lucky Luciano Apr 2012 #37
Must be a new-fangled thing jsmirman Apr 2012 #45
Too bad Bush took the FBI off the case when they let him know in 2005 that there was a huge problem sabrina 1 Apr 2012 #27
And their balance sheet was corrupted because they lied jsmirman Apr 2012 #30
My POINT is that Glass-Steagall had nothing to do with the mortgage crisis banned from Kos Apr 2012 #47
You are crazy pants jsmirman Apr 2012 #52
Ok, slowly for you. Glass-Steagall did not regulate mortgages nor did it have anything to banned from Kos Apr 2012 #56
You really are trolling jsmirman Apr 2012 #59
There has always been foreclosures and bad loans. mmonk Apr 2012 #21
Sure. But 2007-2009 saw a record rate of defaults. banned from Kos Apr 2012 #24
Dude...I am more involved in the game than you think. Lucky Luciano Apr 2012 #28
We are speaking the same language here jsmirman Apr 2012 #32
You're talking securitization. I am addressing the ROOT cause - origination and valuation banned from Kos Apr 2012 #34
This is madness jsmirman Apr 2012 #38
Securitization did not cause defaults and foreclosures! banned from Kos Apr 2012 #43
This is just completely wrong jsmirman Apr 2012 #46
I don't think our friend's trade will settle properly. Lucky Luciano Apr 2012 #48
But no one here is talking Glass-Steagall because my wager required that banned from Kos Apr 2012 #51
How dishonest. You mistitled the article which is really titled banned from Kos Apr 2012 #50
Wha? I gave it a descriptive title to tell you jsmirman Apr 2012 #55
WaMu failed because there were two large runs on the bank.. girl gone mad Apr 2012 #49
Correct on the holding the bag part jsmirman Apr 2012 #57
If home values just kept going up, the bubble would have gotten bigger. Lucky Luciano Apr 2012 #40
Sure, securitization pulled in bad origination practices. banned from Kos Apr 2012 #44
You have your cause and effect reversed. girl gone mad Apr 2012 #53
Its chicken and/or egg. They both fed the mill. But once again Glass-Steagall did NOTHING banned from Kos Apr 2012 #58
Then you're in agreement with Phil Gramm.. girl gone mad Apr 2012 #60
It's not a chicken and/or egg issue, btw. girl gone mad Apr 2012 #62
Investment houses created the market. mmonk Apr 2012 #41
"If home values had kept going up" is an insane statement. JackRiddler Apr 2012 #54
G-S squishy magic juice splashed on them upi402 Apr 2012 #35
I don't have a clue, but I'm curious as ... lostnote12 Apr 2012 #42
I was going to hazard that Goldman Sachs shorted Lehman Fresh_Start Apr 2012 #61
Some reading for you. LiberalAndProud Apr 2012 #65
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I will donate $1000 to th...»Reply #4