General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: CDC: Circumcision Benefits Outweigh Risks [View all]Orrex
(67,396 posts)Your assertion that I am wrong is not compelling, in the same way that your accusations of child abuse are not compelling. You are no authority, and your conclusions are not definitive. Further, your preposterous conclusion that your occasionally itchy foot is the result of blood tests in your infancy tells me that you're a crank.
Since you are the one making various positive claims about the evils of circumcision, it is appropriate to require you to support these statements. Instead, you're following the pseudoscience playbook of making claims and requiring me to refute them.
Also, requiring an article more current than 2010 is hardly "moving the goalposts." All else being equal, if an earlier study is contradicted by a later study, then it is reasonable to require proponents of the earlier study to support it in light of these more recent findings.
I'm happy to give you the last word if it means that you'll shut up thereafter.