Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

banned from Kos

(4,017 posts)
6. Which has exactly NOTHING to do with Lehman's failure.
Fri Apr 20, 2012, 10:06 PM
Apr 2012

Lehman was an I-Bank as you mention and never was concerned about Glass-Stagall regs.


Nice try!

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Bless your heart.. Fumesucker Apr 2012 #1
One down. Once again - how did the repeal of G-S cause Lehman to fail? banned from Kos Apr 2012 #3
I don't know and I don't care.. Fumesucker Apr 2012 #7
The repeal of GS led to too big to fail banks being in jeopardy of failing karynnj Apr 2012 #66
It seems very unlikely that you have $1000. ( n/t ) Make7 Apr 2012 #2
A couple of points: ProSense Apr 2012 #4
Which has exactly NOTHING to do with Lehman's failure. banned from Kos Apr 2012 #6
Really? ProSense Apr 2012 #8
No, your premise is wrong. The economy was never "shielded from I-bank risks" banned from Kos Apr 2012 #11
Again ProSense Apr 2012 #15
What? jsmirman Apr 2012 #36
Lehman was destroyed by the collapse of the subprime mortgage market jsmirman Apr 2012 #5
Garbage - Countrywide, IndyMac, WaMu and 100s others sourced loans banned from Kos Apr 2012 #10
Welcher jsmirman Apr 2012 #16
Are you Charles Keating? Octafish Apr 2012 #9
Question?.....Credit rating agencies.... lostnote12 Apr 2012 #25
Guard-Dogs for the Banks: The Case Against Rating Agencies Octafish Apr 2012 #33
very nice article...thanks...n/p lostnote12 Apr 2012 #39
His check is in the mail along with Ichingcarpenter Apr 2012 #63
The crooks get away with looting the economy and the Treasury. Octafish Apr 2012 #64
If I answer... can you send it to Elizabeth Warren's campaign instead? nt MannyGoldstein Apr 2012 #12
I'll try, but I don't have patience for long posts. Lucky Luciano Apr 2012 #13
Agreed MannyGoldstein Apr 2012 #14
Also very true jsmirman Apr 2012 #17
That is absolute garbage! LEH and BSC failed because of FORECLOSURES & BAD LOANS! banned from Kos Apr 2012 #18
And were they unable to pay their mortgages MannyGoldstein Apr 2012 #19
What the hell are you talking about? jsmirman Apr 2012 #20
Their balance sheet was corrupted because of debtors who did not make payments! banned from Kos Apr 2012 #22
Were there more subprime loans MannyGoldstein Apr 2012 #23
Absolutely! And mortgage originators steered naive people into subprime banned from Kos Apr 2012 #29
Were loans like that widely available prior to the early 2000s? nt MannyGoldstein Apr 2012 #31
What the hell is your point? jsmirman Apr 2012 #26
People do often say "levering up" etc. I say it all the time Lucky Luciano Apr 2012 #37
Must be a new-fangled thing jsmirman Apr 2012 #45
Too bad Bush took the FBI off the case when they let him know in 2005 that there was a huge problem sabrina 1 Apr 2012 #27
And their balance sheet was corrupted because they lied jsmirman Apr 2012 #30
My POINT is that Glass-Steagall had nothing to do with the mortgage crisis banned from Kos Apr 2012 #47
You are crazy pants jsmirman Apr 2012 #52
Ok, slowly for you. Glass-Steagall did not regulate mortgages nor did it have anything to banned from Kos Apr 2012 #56
You really are trolling jsmirman Apr 2012 #59
There has always been foreclosures and bad loans. mmonk Apr 2012 #21
Sure. But 2007-2009 saw a record rate of defaults. banned from Kos Apr 2012 #24
Dude...I am more involved in the game than you think. Lucky Luciano Apr 2012 #28
We are speaking the same language here jsmirman Apr 2012 #32
You're talking securitization. I am addressing the ROOT cause - origination and valuation banned from Kos Apr 2012 #34
This is madness jsmirman Apr 2012 #38
Securitization did not cause defaults and foreclosures! banned from Kos Apr 2012 #43
This is just completely wrong jsmirman Apr 2012 #46
I don't think our friend's trade will settle properly. Lucky Luciano Apr 2012 #48
But no one here is talking Glass-Steagall because my wager required that banned from Kos Apr 2012 #51
How dishonest. You mistitled the article which is really titled banned from Kos Apr 2012 #50
Wha? I gave it a descriptive title to tell you jsmirman Apr 2012 #55
WaMu failed because there were two large runs on the bank.. girl gone mad Apr 2012 #49
Correct on the holding the bag part jsmirman Apr 2012 #57
If home values just kept going up, the bubble would have gotten bigger. Lucky Luciano Apr 2012 #40
Sure, securitization pulled in bad origination practices. banned from Kos Apr 2012 #44
You have your cause and effect reversed. girl gone mad Apr 2012 #53
Its chicken and/or egg. They both fed the mill. But once again Glass-Steagall did NOTHING banned from Kos Apr 2012 #58
Then you're in agreement with Phil Gramm.. girl gone mad Apr 2012 #60
It's not a chicken and/or egg issue, btw. girl gone mad Apr 2012 #62
Investment houses created the market. mmonk Apr 2012 #41
"If home values had kept going up" is an insane statement. JackRiddler Apr 2012 #54
G-S squishy magic juice splashed on them upi402 Apr 2012 #35
I don't have a clue, but I'm curious as ... lostnote12 Apr 2012 #42
I was going to hazard that Goldman Sachs shorted Lehman Fresh_Start Apr 2012 #61
Some reading for you. LiberalAndProud Apr 2012 #65
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I will donate $1000 to th...»Reply #6