General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: It's is amazing how little regard many posters have for the role of the states [View all]jwirr
(39,215 posts)disabled daughter and my other two children (due to divorce) welfare was controlled by the states. But it was well known that some states paid a lot less than others. I lived in one of the good states (Iowa) but if you lived in some states in the south they got very little at all. I assume that the thinking regarding welfare has not changed much today with the conservatives.
For that reason the federal government took over state welfare programs in what was called AFDC. It let the states administer the programs but the laws governing the program came from the feds. Each state had to follow the laws or risk losing the subsidy from the feds. What happened was that each state had a formula that was used to figure out the monthly amount that a client received. States were different but it was based on cost of living in the state. Iowa remained one of the better states and we did not get cut. Some of those other states went from receiving $12 a month to at least a percentage of the cost of living.
In this case the Feds did help.