Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: How I would describe the division within DU [View all]think
(11,641 posts)104. Goldman Sachs sold worthless securities to it's clients and then bet against them
leading in part to one of America's worst financial meltdowns in history.
Its actions did immense harm to its clients, and helped create the financial crisis that nearly plunged us into a second Great Depression, Levin said in a statement today. Whether the decision by the Department of Justice is the product of weak laws or weak enforcement, Goldman Sachs actions were deceptive and immoral.
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-08-09/justice-finds-no-viable-basis-for-charges-against-goldman.html
And yet you prefer to deflect and to ask how much money a candidate has raised while ignoring the implications of the source of the money.
If one can ignore the financial devestation Goldman Sachs has reaked on the American people what else are they willing to ignore. Koch industries will give you money if you ignore their pollution, union busting and demands for tax cuts for the top 1%. Should decent candidates take money from the Koch brothers?
Ignore this at your own peril because Goldman Sachs hasn't stopped scamming the American people.
The Vampire Squid Strikes Again: The Mega Banks' Most Devious Scam Yet
BY MATT TAIBBI | February 12, 2014
~Snip~
And last summer, The New York Times described how Goldman Sachs was caught systematically delaying the delivery of metals out of a network of warehouses it owned in order to jack up rents and artificially boost prices.
You might not have been surprised that Goldman got caught scamming the world again, but it was certainly news to a lot of people that an investment bank with no industrial expertise, just five years removed from a federal bailout, stores and controls enough of America's aluminum supply to affect world prices.
How was all of this possible? And who signed off on it?
By exploiting loopholes in a dense, decade-and-a-half-old piece of financial legislation, Wall Street has effected a revolutionary change that American citizens never discussed, debated or prepared for, and certainly never explicitly permitted in any meaningful way: the wholesale merger of high finance with heavy industry. This blitzkrieg reorganization of our economy has left millions of Americans facing a smorgasbord of frightfully unexpected new problems. Do we even have a regulatory structure in place to look out for these new forms of manipulation? (Answer: We don't.) And given that the banking sector that came so close to ruining the world economy five years ago has now vastly expanded its footprint, who's in charge of preventing the next crash?
Read more: http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/the-vampire-squid-strikes-again-the-mega-banks-most-devious-scam-yet-20140212#ixzz3L1ygbsHm
BY MATT TAIBBI | February 12, 2014
~Snip~
And last summer, The New York Times described how Goldman Sachs was caught systematically delaying the delivery of metals out of a network of warehouses it owned in order to jack up rents and artificially boost prices.
You might not have been surprised that Goldman got caught scamming the world again, but it was certainly news to a lot of people that an investment bank with no industrial expertise, just five years removed from a federal bailout, stores and controls enough of America's aluminum supply to affect world prices.
How was all of this possible? And who signed off on it?
By exploiting loopholes in a dense, decade-and-a-half-old piece of financial legislation, Wall Street has effected a revolutionary change that American citizens never discussed, debated or prepared for, and certainly never explicitly permitted in any meaningful way: the wholesale merger of high finance with heavy industry. This blitzkrieg reorganization of our economy has left millions of Americans facing a smorgasbord of frightfully unexpected new problems. Do we even have a regulatory structure in place to look out for these new forms of manipulation? (Answer: We don't.) And given that the banking sector that came so close to ruining the world economy five years ago has now vastly expanded its footprint, who's in charge of preventing the next crash?
Read more: http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/the-vampire-squid-strikes-again-the-mega-banks-most-devious-scam-yet-20140212#ixzz3L1ygbsHm
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
120 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
As a Linux user I really like penguins, but I hereby appoint you DU's resident Riki-Tiki-Tavi
Recursion
Dec 2014
#19
That weakling Picard, Kirk would have fought him to the death after first beam down.
Rex
Dec 2014
#36
The only two Democrats to beat Republican incumbents last month were conservatives
Recursion
Dec 2014
#47
Wait, a woodchuck is a marmot? And is also a groundhog? And a whistle-pig is a
petronius
Dec 2014
#69
I think that is part of it - but it misses the potential of a real transformative campaign
el_bryanto
Dec 2014
#5
Given that woodchucks and we'll call them wolverines dominate the media it's hardly surprising
Fumesucker
Dec 2014
#11
So, one thing I've noticed, is that everyone -- and I mean everyone -- feels attacked here
Recursion
Dec 2014
#13
Barack Obama won two presidential elections despite being portrayed and perceived ...
dawg
Dec 2014
#14
Good points. But calling the president a lying piece of shit is disrespectful, divisive and shameful
brush
Dec 2014
#79
(If that's a serious question) it's from a popular cartoon series often posted here
Recursion
Dec 2014
#23
It's not a cartoon, it is a political comic strip in print, static, not animated.
Bluenorthwest
Dec 2014
#34
ah, the pragmatic shades of grey woodchuck vs. the purity black and white of the penguin.
Tuesday Afternoon
Dec 2014
#25
Penguins believe in the fierce urgency of the now, Woodchucks say 'let's let the violence continue
Bluenorthwest
Dec 2014
#30
That's not even cloes to true. But it does serve you in avoiding the point I suppose.
Bluenorthwest
Dec 2014
#40
Of course we don't have national initiatives, we all know that our elections are State elections, no
Bluenorthwest
Dec 2014
#49
Right, and Americans repeatedly don't vote for politicians who support the initiatives they vote for
Recursion
Dec 2014
#51
Hillary is just a moderate Republican, let's be honest I am neither a woodchuck nor a penguin.
silvershadow
Dec 2014
#35
I love Bernie, but when people say Hllary is a Republican then tout Warren, who was a hard core GOP
Bluenorthwest
Dec 2014
#45
The hell of this is Hillary has had these Democrat positions for years, and some have
Thinkingabout
Dec 2014
#58
You can put any name on her you want, she isn't anymore "corporate" than anyone who has
Thinkingabout
Dec 2014
#74
She still isn't any more "corporate" than the others, the lobbyists are in their faces all the
Thinkingabout
Dec 2014
#85
Goldman Sachs isn't just another corporation. They're at the heart of why the game is rigged
think
Dec 2014
#87
Part of telling it like it is goes to if you don't like candidates taking money from corporations
Thinkingabout
Dec 2014
#90
Utter nonsense. Some corporations are evil scum but most aren't. It's not all or nothing.
think
Dec 2014
#93
Goldman Sachs sold worthless securities to it's clients and then bet against them
think
Dec 2014
#104
I did not see where your campaign fund is located and how much is in the fund. The
Thinkingabout
Dec 2014
#113
I provided a way to halt any corporations from giving to candidates whether it is
Thinkingabout
Dec 2014
#116
No more than other members of Congress or political offices. They all take contributions
Thinkingabout
Dec 2014
#86
Arkansas raised the minimum wage while electing the Republican Senate candidate
Recursion
Dec 2014
#44
But the penguin shades are way cooler than the woodchuck librarian glasses
hootinholler
Dec 2014
#48
Same Third Way talking point. Such desperation to drum that central, absurd claim:
woo me with science
Dec 2014
#55
Well, since I have no idea what makes one a "corporate" (ooh! scary!) Democrat, I can't respond
Recursion
Dec 2014
#57
I think it's middle of the road social liberals (Democrats) vs. the misc. disaffected cultural left
Sen. Walter Sobchak
Dec 2014
#62
Neither woodchucks nor penguins pick our candidates--it's the walruses and giant squids
librechik
Dec 2014
#111