Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I will donate $1000 to the DNC now if someone explains how G-S caused Lehman to fail. [View all]banned from Kos
(4,017 posts)43. Securitization did not cause defaults and foreclosures!
WaMu failed in 2008. They choked on their own bad paper and risk practices on mortgage loans. Their failure had nothing to do with securitization.
As of June 30, 2008, Washington Mutual Bank had total assets of US$ 307 billion, with 2,239 retail branch offices operating in 15 states, with 4,932 ATMs, and 43,198 employees. It held liabilities in the form of deposits of $188.3 billion, and owed $82.9 billion to the Federal Home Loan Bank, and had subordinated debt of $7.8 billion. It held as assets of $118.9 billion in single-family loans, of which $52.9 billion were "option adjustable rate mortgages" (Option ARMs), with $16 billion in subprime mortgage loans, and $53.4 billion of Home Equity lines of Credit (HELOCs) and credit cards receivables of $10.6 billion. It was servicing for itself and other banks loans totaling $689.7 billion, of which $442.7 were for other banks. It had non-performing assets of $11.6 billion, including $3.23 billion in payment option ARMs and $3.0 billion in subprime mortgage loans.
(Wiki)
WaMu was the largest bank failure in US history due STRICTLY to their own lax credit standards.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
66 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I will donate $1000 to the DNC now if someone explains how G-S caused Lehman to fail. [View all]
banned from Kos
Apr 2012
OP
No, your premise is wrong. The economy was never "shielded from I-bank risks"
banned from Kos
Apr 2012
#11
If I answer... can you send it to Elizabeth Warren's campaign instead? nt
MannyGoldstein
Apr 2012
#12
That is absolute garbage! LEH and BSC failed because of FORECLOSURES & BAD LOANS!
banned from Kos
Apr 2012
#18
Their balance sheet was corrupted because of debtors who did not make payments!
banned from Kos
Apr 2012
#22
Absolutely! And mortgage originators steered naive people into subprime
banned from Kos
Apr 2012
#29
Too bad Bush took the FBI off the case when they let him know in 2005 that there was a huge problem
sabrina 1
Apr 2012
#27
My POINT is that Glass-Steagall had nothing to do with the mortgage crisis
banned from Kos
Apr 2012
#47
Ok, slowly for you. Glass-Steagall did not regulate mortgages nor did it have anything to
banned from Kos
Apr 2012
#56
You're talking securitization. I am addressing the ROOT cause - origination and valuation
banned from Kos
Apr 2012
#34
But no one here is talking Glass-Steagall because my wager required that
banned from Kos
Apr 2012
#51
Its chicken and/or egg. They both fed the mill. But once again Glass-Steagall did NOTHING
banned from Kos
Apr 2012
#58