Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I will donate $1000 to the DNC now if someone explains how G-S caused Lehman to fail. [View all]jsmirman
(4,507 posts)55. Wha? I gave it a descriptive title to tell you
what you were looking at.
I gave the link that title, because that topic is extensively discussed in that article.
The beginning of the end, as the Senate's investigation suggests, came in 1999, when WaMu snapped up a subprime lender named Long Beach Mortgage Company. Long Beach was a major player in the booming securitization businessthe origination of loans to be bundled into bonds backed by those pools of loans. These mortgage-backed securities were then sold to Wall Street banks and the two government-sponsored housing corporations, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. In 2006, Long Beach injected a staggering $30 billion in subprime loans into the securitization machine, a sixfold increase from only three years before...
This cutthroat, purely profit-driven philosophy meant WaMu and Long Beach increasingly pushed their employees, in the early 2000s, to focus more on volume than qualityselling more and more loans with little regard for the underwriting or potential success of those loans. "WaMu built its conveyor belt of toxic mortgages to feed Wall Street's appetite for mortgage backed securities," Levin said. "To keep the conveyor belt running and feed the securitization machine on Wall Street, Washington Mutual engaged in lending practices that created a mortgage time bomb."
...the pressure to churn out more loans was "tremendous." Salespeople were told to do "whatever it took" to pump out more loans to feed WaMus securitization frenzy. "In WaMu's loan business, volume was king," Sen. Carl Levin (D-MI), chair of the investigations subcommittee, said... ...The full-steam-ahead mentality to subprime lending, both in WaMu's prime lending operation and Long Beach's subprime machine, inevitably led to shoddier and grossly fraudulent practices within WaMu... The damage, though, had already been done, and both Long Beach and WaMu's prime and subprime assembly line and shoddy lending practices sowed the seeds of the $300-billion banks demise...
http://motherjones.com/mojo/2010/04/washington-mutual-senate-investigation-levin-killinger-failure-autopsy-april-report
There's even more in the rest of the article. Nice empty accusation.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
66 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I will donate $1000 to the DNC now if someone explains how G-S caused Lehman to fail. [View all]
banned from Kos
Apr 2012
OP
No, your premise is wrong. The economy was never "shielded from I-bank risks"
banned from Kos
Apr 2012
#11
If I answer... can you send it to Elizabeth Warren's campaign instead? nt
MannyGoldstein
Apr 2012
#12
That is absolute garbage! LEH and BSC failed because of FORECLOSURES & BAD LOANS!
banned from Kos
Apr 2012
#18
Their balance sheet was corrupted because of debtors who did not make payments!
banned from Kos
Apr 2012
#22
Absolutely! And mortgage originators steered naive people into subprime
banned from Kos
Apr 2012
#29
Too bad Bush took the FBI off the case when they let him know in 2005 that there was a huge problem
sabrina 1
Apr 2012
#27
My POINT is that Glass-Steagall had nothing to do with the mortgage crisis
banned from Kos
Apr 2012
#47
Ok, slowly for you. Glass-Steagall did not regulate mortgages nor did it have anything to
banned from Kos
Apr 2012
#56
You're talking securitization. I am addressing the ROOT cause - origination and valuation
banned from Kos
Apr 2012
#34
But no one here is talking Glass-Steagall because my wager required that
banned from Kos
Apr 2012
#51
Its chicken and/or egg. They both fed the mill. But once again Glass-Steagall did NOTHING
banned from Kos
Apr 2012
#58