Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: TPP: do you truly give a crap? [View all]RiverLover
(7,830 posts)13. This is the problem Elizabeth Warren has with it~
Elizabeth Warren Speaks Out Against The Presidents Trans-Pacific Free Trade Agreement
Sept 2013
As more and more people across the United States find out about the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), were beginning to see a growing opposition to not only the Presidents latest pet project, but his economy-killing, corporatist trade agenda in general.
Not only are people upset about President Obama and others in control keeping the details of the TPP a secret, but President Obamas declaration that hes willing to use fast-track authority have many up in arms, including Senator Elizabeth Warren.
The problem with President Obama utilizing fast track trade authority a common tool in passing international trade arrangements is that Congress is limited to a black and white vote of yes or no. Essentially, no changes can be made to the text of the TPP. This is alarming when you consider that trade agreements like the TPP affect millions of Americans.
By dismissing input from congressional representatives and the public on trade agreement matters, President Obama is sending a message to the country that says bluntly: I dont care about your opinion.
The message from the President is resonating across the country, and people like Sen. Elizabeth Warren have begun to raise the alarm about the harm the TPP could do to our country. In fact, Sen. Warren has recently been demanding more transparency from the White House regarding the TPP, condemning the secrecy it has been shrouded in.
Shes even said that if transparency would lead to widespread public opposition to a trade agreement, then that trade agreement should not be the policy of the United States.
Her words align with many others who believe the only reason President Obama would be going to such lengths to keep the details of the TPP a secret is because he knows if the public ever found out what was in the text, we would never allow it to pass...
http://economyincrisis.org/content/elizabeth-warren-speaks-out-against-the-presidents-trans-pacific-free-trade-agreement
Sept 2013
As more and more people across the United States find out about the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), were beginning to see a growing opposition to not only the Presidents latest pet project, but his economy-killing, corporatist trade agenda in general.
Not only are people upset about President Obama and others in control keeping the details of the TPP a secret, but President Obamas declaration that hes willing to use fast-track authority have many up in arms, including Senator Elizabeth Warren.
The problem with President Obama utilizing fast track trade authority a common tool in passing international trade arrangements is that Congress is limited to a black and white vote of yes or no. Essentially, no changes can be made to the text of the TPP. This is alarming when you consider that trade agreements like the TPP affect millions of Americans.
By dismissing input from congressional representatives and the public on trade agreement matters, President Obama is sending a message to the country that says bluntly: I dont care about your opinion.
The message from the President is resonating across the country, and people like Sen. Elizabeth Warren have begun to raise the alarm about the harm the TPP could do to our country. In fact, Sen. Warren has recently been demanding more transparency from the White House regarding the TPP, condemning the secrecy it has been shrouded in.
Shes even said that if transparency would lead to widespread public opposition to a trade agreement, then that trade agreement should not be the policy of the United States.
Her words align with many others who believe the only reason President Obama would be going to such lengths to keep the details of the TPP a secret is because he knows if the public ever found out what was in the text, we would never allow it to pass...
http://economyincrisis.org/content/elizabeth-warren-speaks-out-against-the-presidents-trans-pacific-free-trade-agreement
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
54 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
According to Krugman, proponents and opponents of it are hyping the positives and negatives.
Ykcutnek
Dec 2014
#5
Krugman, an economist, is analyzing the economics. My biggest concern is legal.
Jim Lane
Dec 2014
#20
I don't like it for the same reasons Obama gave when he said he was going to re-negotiate NAFTA
nationalize the fed
Dec 2014
#9
Canada and Mexico are part of TPP negotiations. Terms of trade with them are being "renegotiated".
pampango
Dec 2014
#14
We* bail out the banks. Give multi-billion dollar bonuses to the banksters who stole it.
Octafish
Dec 2014
#10
Why is it taking so long to get it passed? I thought corportists, Obama, other nations planning to
Hoyt
Dec 2014
#11
I oppose any agreement that is so bad, so thrreatening to our society that its provisions have
JDPriestly
Dec 2014
#12
If it was to be so good for us, where's the transparency? I'm sure the 1% love it!
dmosh42
Dec 2014
#15
It would be a good idea IF, as China and some republicans seem to fear, it has labor and environment
pampango
Dec 2014
#16
Environmental protections and labor rights have been in the language of the TTP from the start.
ucrdem
Dec 2014
#21
We don't know that. If they are not strict, there is not good reason to consider them. n/t
pampango
Dec 2014
#40
I believe they have made clear that is the intent. I don't think it will matter.
pampango
Dec 2014
#46
Once we can get our wages on par with China it will be an employment renaissance.
raouldukelives
Dec 2014
#18
Nat'l Geographic: 4 Ways Green Groups Say Trans-Pacific Partnership Will Hurt Environment
RiverLover
Dec 2014
#24
IMO the TPP is a step towards making the US (and the world) sort of like a giant WalMart.
djean111
Dec 2014
#29
As I brought to another poster, there's a simple test for whether it's a good idea.
Scootaloo
Dec 2014
#51