Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

RiverLover

(7,830 posts)
Sat Dec 6, 2014, 07:17 AM Dec 2014

Strange Bedfellows Are Blocking The McConnell-Obama Trade Deal (TPP) [View all]

(The title could easily be "Strange Bedfellows Are Pushing For The TPP" imo...)

Strange Bedfellows Are Blocking The McConnell-Obama Trade Deal
12/3/14

WASHINGTON -- Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) has been dreaming about cutting major deals as Senate majority leader for most of his career. Next year, he'll finally get the chance to do it with the Trans-Pacific Partnership, the most ambitious free trade agreement since the Clinton era. The only thing standing in his way is his own political party.

President Barack Obama's administration has been negotiating the TPP since the beginning of his presidency. Twelve nations are now involved in the talks, which have major implications for the U.S. economy, public health and foreign policy. But Obama has faced two domestic obstacles to enacting his pact: Democrats in Congress, who worry it will exacerbate income inequality, and a bloc of House Republicans, who are up in arms about the deal's implications for executive power and national sovereignty.

The administration conducts the talks in secret, so the public only knows about terms of the deal through leaked documents. But opposition from conservative hardliners has intensified since GOP gains in the midterm elections, even as McConnell has pledged to cut a deal with Obama on TPP as one of his first orders of business next year.

"I think it's insane to give Obama some power to negotiate an important treaty in secret without any supervision, not have to account to Congress or the Senate," Phyllis Schlafly, a prominent social conservative best known for opposing the Equal Rights Amendment in the 1970s, told HuffPost last week. "It just blows my mind why Republicans would be willing to do that. We've been yapping for months about his executive actions and his executive amnesty and taking unconstitutional positions."

The internal GOP feud over what some conservative critics are calling "Obamatrade" is just the latest in a series of skirmishes between the party's corporate-friendly leadership and its populist base....

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/12/03/mitch-mcconnell-tpp-tea-party_n_6182126.html


The fight of populists vs corporatists?
25 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Good news! grahamhgreen Dec 2014 #1
Phyllis Schlafly is an authority on trade agreements? ucrdem Dec 2014 #2
Right along with Mitch McConnell who is pushing for it... RiverLover Dec 2014 #3
From what I've seen it's a step up from NAFTA ucrdem Dec 2014 #4
That's so weird, I read the opposite~ RiverLover Dec 2014 #5
Dunno, but I was looking at State Dept info, not Moyers. ucrdem Dec 2014 #6
I trust Moyers far more than I trust Obama and Kerry on this... Johnyawl Dec 2014 #7
The negotiators are trade representatives of the participating nations. ucrdem Dec 2014 #8
Have you read what Alan Greyson(D) said about the actual agreement? RiverLover Dec 2014 #13
I haven't but I will. ucrdem Dec 2014 #16
Me too. RiverLover Dec 2014 #9
I never really trusted.. sendero Dec 2014 #10
If big corporations got everything they wanted we'd be discussing President Romney. nt ucrdem Dec 2014 #11
Nonsense.. sendero Dec 2014 #12
I imagine Ms Schlafly will be relieved to hear this. nt ucrdem Dec 2014 #14
Like most people.. sendero Dec 2014 #17
+100000 Katashi_itto Dec 2014 #24
Problem is, you're not going to see an "official draft" of the agreement until it's too late. Buns_of_Fire Dec 2014 #23
You need to start reading the leaked documents and then decide if you want Foreign Corporations sabrina 1 Dec 2014 #22
opposing Fast Track is perfectly in line with conservative principles Enrique Dec 2014 #15
I'm not happy being on the same side of an issue as the John Birch Society starroute Dec 2014 #18
You don't even need to listen to them to know that this agreement IS a threat to US sovereignty. sabrina 1 Dec 2014 #25
Doesn't matter how this piece of shit rape of American labor is stopped. 99Forever Dec 2014 #19
There's this really famous guy who works in an oval office FiveGoodMen Dec 2014 #20
the NAFTA vote also split both parties 51/49 apiece, IIRC MisterP Dec 2014 #21
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Strange Bedfellows Are Bl...