Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

RiverLover

(7,830 posts)
5. That's so weird, I read the opposite~
Sat Dec 6, 2014, 09:31 AM
Dec 2014
TPP Wikileaked: US Watering Down Enviro Protections in Secret Trade Deal
January 2014



Another chapter in the tale of the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) — a secret international trade deal being pushed by the Obama administration and described by critics as “NAFTA on steroids” — has once again been Wikileaked. This one deals with the environment, and it shows that, by and large, the US is caving on environmental standards it had previously set for international trade agreements.

Environmental groups say the protections that are included in the document are weak — and, furthermore, that the pact contains no enforcement mechanisms. This breaks with recent precedent — in 2007, Bush reached an agreement with congressional Democrats that required environmental provisions in trade agreements to be legally binding.

“The lack of fully-enforceable environmental safeguards means negotiators are allowing a unique opportunity to protect wildlife and support legal sustainable trade of renewable resources to slip through their fingers,” said Carter Roberts, president and CEO of the World Wildlife Fund. “These nations account for more than a quarter of global trade in fish and wood products and they have a responsibility to address trade’s impact on wildlife crime, illegal logging and overfishing.”...

http://billmoyers.com/2014/01/16/tpp-wikileaked-us-watering-down-enviro-protections-in-secret-trade-deal/


Who to believe?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Good news! grahamhgreen Dec 2014 #1
Phyllis Schlafly is an authority on trade agreements? ucrdem Dec 2014 #2
Right along with Mitch McConnell who is pushing for it... RiverLover Dec 2014 #3
From what I've seen it's a step up from NAFTA ucrdem Dec 2014 #4
That's so weird, I read the opposite~ RiverLover Dec 2014 #5
Dunno, but I was looking at State Dept info, not Moyers. ucrdem Dec 2014 #6
I trust Moyers far more than I trust Obama and Kerry on this... Johnyawl Dec 2014 #7
The negotiators are trade representatives of the participating nations. ucrdem Dec 2014 #8
Have you read what Alan Greyson(D) said about the actual agreement? RiverLover Dec 2014 #13
I haven't but I will. ucrdem Dec 2014 #16
Me too. RiverLover Dec 2014 #9
I never really trusted.. sendero Dec 2014 #10
If big corporations got everything they wanted we'd be discussing President Romney. nt ucrdem Dec 2014 #11
Nonsense.. sendero Dec 2014 #12
I imagine Ms Schlafly will be relieved to hear this. nt ucrdem Dec 2014 #14
Like most people.. sendero Dec 2014 #17
+100000 Katashi_itto Dec 2014 #24
Problem is, you're not going to see an "official draft" of the agreement until it's too late. Buns_of_Fire Dec 2014 #23
You need to start reading the leaked documents and then decide if you want Foreign Corporations sabrina 1 Dec 2014 #22
opposing Fast Track is perfectly in line with conservative principles Enrique Dec 2014 #15
I'm not happy being on the same side of an issue as the John Birch Society starroute Dec 2014 #18
You don't even need to listen to them to know that this agreement IS a threat to US sovereignty. sabrina 1 Dec 2014 #25
Doesn't matter how this piece of shit rape of American labor is stopped. 99Forever Dec 2014 #19
There's this really famous guy who works in an oval office FiveGoodMen Dec 2014 #20
the NAFTA vote also split both parties 51/49 apiece, IIRC MisterP Dec 2014 #21
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Strange Bedfellows Are Bl...»Reply #5