General Discussion

heaven05

(18,124 posts)

70. "The Missouri AG

Sat Dec 6, 2014, 10:30 AM

Dec 2014

now proclaims that was wrong(introducing misleading information into GJ proceedings)and the Missouri law needs to be changed and updated to reflect the SCOTUS ruling". The Mo. law was invalid since 1986! What's so hard about understanding this fact? The information was introduced to the ferguson GJ to confused and obfuscate. No other reason is apparent. Such transparent bullshit! When it comes to justice for people of color, this is the M.O., perfected over generations of white racist scheming, that is the american brand/level of justice for people of color. geez.. It is infuriating that they feel that people of color and any other decent person is stupid enough to believe them. I said decent, not the wilsonthepig lovers present here and many other places I have been watching/reading. Fascism is alive and well in amerika and racism is it's blood brother.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

96 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Missouri AG Confirms Michael Brown Grand Jury Misled by St. Louis DA [View all] avebury Dec 2014 OP

"So what is the MO Attorney General prepared to do about it?" Nuclear Unicorn Dec 2014 #1

Somebody Better Do Something billhicks76 Dec 2014 #14

And appoint a special prosecutor. MoonRiver Dec 2014 #15

Downstate in Limbaugh and KKK land? gordianot Dec 2014 #23

Well, what is your suggestion? MoonRiver Dec 2014 #68

keep doubting heaven05 Dec 2014 #71

Yep, because it's hopeless. Maybe it is. :-( MoonRiver Dec 2014 #77

Nothing is hopeless with me heaven05 Dec 2014 #79

It was an ADA that presented the outdated law. Calista241 Dec 2014 #74

Understood and not contested but I'm not sure how that relates to/changes my post. nt Nuclear Unicorn Dec 2014 #75

with the guidance heaven05 Dec 2014 #82

Since you can apparently close bridges without Calista241 Dec 2014 #91

I don't believe THAT heaven05 Dec 2014 #92

Michael Brown never had a chance RockaFowler Dec 2014 #2

Post removed Post removed Dec 2014 #36

Would you mind sharing the link to the shopkeeper's grand jury testimony about that? IdaBriggs Dec 2014 #40

well, with a sig line/moniker heaven05 Dec 2014 #72

nice bullshit post rufus dog Dec 2014 #41

You don't know that he "robbed" a store. He was never convicted therefore innocent. rhett o rick Dec 2014 #42

Didn't Johnson admit it was him? joeglow3 Dec 2014 #50

The Republicans are saying it was him. No such testimony from the store owner but that doesn't stop rhett o rick Dec 2014 #53

So his attorney lied joeglow3 Dec 2014 #54

It doesn't matter. He was not charged with or convicted of any crime of that nature. MADem Dec 2014 #56

Shouldn't you apply the same logic to the officer? joeglow3 Dec 2014 #59

No heaven05 Dec 2014 #73

You read too much into my comments joeglow3 Dec 2014 #87

yeah, I hear you heaven05 Dec 2014 #88

Look, you don't need to be a weatherman to know which way the wind is blowing... MADem Dec 2014 #84

I am not debating the facts of the case joeglow3 Dec 2014 #86

I think the "logic" that justice can suffer a miscarriage is what needs to be acknowledged, here. MADem Dec 2014 #89

If Ken Lay died, that is. Scuba Dec 2014 #80

Yeah!!! Ha ha...I know a wise old woman who thinks he's sunning himself in Tahiti! MADem Dec 2014 #81

What about innocent until proven guilty? blackspade Dec 2014 #45

+1 Stargazer09 Dec 2014 #57

you are a shithead pasto76 Dec 2014 #46

You actually seem like the type that thinks you got the correct punishment. Nt Logical Dec 2014 #49

I believe you picked the perfect DU name. FarPoint Dec 2014 #52

Should all shoplifters to be shot immediately, without remorse bhikkhu Dec 2014 #61

One of the issues that needed to be decided in a jury trial was whether Wilson had any JDPriestly Dec 2014 #62

I am growing weary of your snarky remarks. Enthusiast Dec 2014 #63

Good to know O'Donnell's story is gaining traction. Wonder if the MSM will take the okaawhatever Dec 2014 #3

i was just about to post this....OUTRAGEOUS eom noiretextatique Dec 2014 #4

K&R! Sherman A1 Dec 2014 #5

So what is the AG going to do about it!? Dont call me Shirley Dec 2014 #6

At a minimum I would like to see him avebury Dec 2014 #20

+1 Dont call me Shirley Dec 2014 #22

I dont think there is anything the state can do about it davidn3600 Dec 2014 #7

Is the AG bound by the grand jury decision? csziggy Dec 2014 #31

They should have done what Florida did with Trayvon davidn3600 Dec 2014 #32

The Florida governor selected a prosecutor he KNEW would let the case slide csziggy Dec 2014 #33

Our AG can't do that in MO. xmas74 Dec 2014 #94

Need to seat a new grand jury Uben Dec 2014 #8

That is an excellent question. lark Dec 2014 #9

There is no verdict to be stricken - the grand jury just didn't indict csziggy Dec 2014 #35

k&r.... spanone Dec 2014 #10

Hopefully - PsychGrad Dec 2014 #11

I am pretty sure someone can be brought before a second grand jury but Glimmer of Hope Dec 2014 #28

Agreed... PsychGrad Dec 2014 #29

If a grand jury doesn't indict the prosecutor can try again at another time. There is no PoliticAverse Dec 2014 #39

Good! PsychGrad Dec 2014 #44

Hopefully the Ag will charge Wilson with murder and let a jury decide. n/t A Simple Game Dec 2014 #12

Thusfar... ReRe Dec 2014 #17

I don't know the law that well, especially in Missouri but as Wilson was never charged A Simple Game Dec 2014 #38

No... ReRe Dec 2014 #47

In MO the AG cannot prosecute a case. xmas74 Dec 2014 #95

That would be great (if the Feds came in... ReRe Dec 2014 #96

one more reason of many to disbar the DA 0rganism Dec 2014 #13

He was pretty transparent if you have ever watched a prosecutor at a press conference after a loss. Dustlawyer Dec 2014 #25

remember what happened angrychair Dec 2014 #16

This is what I'm hoping for!!!!! n/t PsychGrad Dec 2014 #24

Would the other instructions have changed anything? Lee-Lee Dec 2014 #18

"By Wilson's account"... bluesbassman Dec 2014 #21

Exactly!!!! PsychGrad Dec 2014 #26

Wilson's appearance was odd angrychair Dec 2014 #30

Look at the way Wilson's car was parked Kalidurga Dec 2014 #34

The car that Wilson was allowed to drive off in afterwards? That car? Tainted evidence. Lars39 Dec 2014 #37

How often does a cop get to bag his own weapon into evidence and wash off any evidence? Rex Dec 2014 #51

As soon as the investigating cops arrived, avebury Dec 2014 #65

wilsonthepig heaven05 Dec 2014 #78

So there'll be another "legitimate" grand jury now? nt valerief Dec 2014 #19

It was done intentionally of course, i mean they are all but admitting that NoJusticeNoPeace Dec 2014 #27

Wasn't this issue corrected for the GJ before they began deliberating? (nt) Nye Bevan Dec 2014 #43

Yes but it is a matter of too little to late avebury Dec 2014 #67

In the grand jury I sat on, the prosecutors often didn't or wouldn't answer Calista241 Dec 2014 #76

But intentionally presenting the GJ with false information avebury Dec 2014 #83

why were they given the wrong information at all? noiretextatique Dec 2014 #69

So is there a do over since this was not a criminal trial? Rex Dec 2014 #48

The Supreme Court does not amend laws. That is a legislative function, not a judicial merrily Dec 2014 #55

WOW.. this is Something.. and yes.. please Do something.. Special Prosecutor would be a start.. and Cha Dec 2014 #58

his wording tells you what he's going to do marym625 Dec 2014 #60

So,,,,,,, bobGandolf Dec 2014 #64

That question gets asked alot, what prepared to do now? That would require thinking up solutions. lonestarnot Dec 2014 #66

"The Missouri AG heaven05 Dec 2014 #70

Here's hoping for a re-trial sakabatou Dec 2014 #85

All I can do is REC your thread aint_no_life_nowhere Dec 2014 #90

This has been discussed on DU before, in the case of Daisy Coleman. xmas74 Dec 2014 #93