Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Explaining white privilege to a broke white person [View all]Orrex
(67,117 posts)42. It's a poorly-chosen term.
It seems deliberately conceived to make the listener defensive and to ignore any rational argument that follows it.
I explicitly acknowledge that I have clearly benefitted from it many times over, but even so I see the term as problematic. All the moreso when one is presented with a checklist of "privileges," many of which might have little or no bearing on one's actual life.
If the most important thing is to preserve the term, then it's fine. If the most important thing is to get people to open their eyes about what "white privilege" really is and how they benefit from it, then perhaps another strategy might be more effective.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
95 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
just because a bully picks on the group next to the group im in doesnt neccessarily
belzabubba333
Dec 2014
#20
That's different than arguing any white is better off than any black.
DemocratSinceBirth
Dec 2014
#93
I think you're missing the larger point while you're quibbling about semantics. nt
pnwmom
Dec 2014
#11
"I don't want to talk about this, so I'll make it about something else instead!" (nt)
Posteritatis
Dec 2014
#62
"The solution is to stop judging people by what color they are." Of course it is.
nomorenomore08
Dec 2014
#76
It is a strange phenomenon imo, to see an exclusion to 'white privilege' based on low wages.
Rex
Dec 2014
#6
A person without a pot to piss in isn't going to be convinced they are privileged
Man from Pickens
Dec 2014
#10
Not exactly. Then he was directed to a better form of the argument, the McIntosh's essay.
hughee99
Dec 2014
#86
Oh I agree they won't be convinced, but that does not mean the term is not accurate.
Rex
Dec 2014
#16
This sort of conversation reflects one of the reasons why low income whites shun Democrats
bklyncowgirl
Dec 2014
#18
Actually, it's because of the fucking idiots who deliberately twist the meaning
NuclearDem
Dec 2014
#37
That does not change the fact that many working class white men believe exactly that.
bklyncowgirl
Dec 2014
#91
Just about the only "good job" that someone could possibly have lost to "cheap illegal workers"
cheapdate
Dec 2014
#78
I was thinking construction but back in the day meatpacking was often unionized as well.
bklyncowgirl
Dec 2014
#87
The question is, if your white friend was struggling to pay rent, medical bills, etc.,
Nye Bevan
Dec 2014
#22
No, Nye, its Sunday morning and I am still trying to remember where I parked my car...
Dr. Xavier
Dec 2014
#41
Please, good people, try to understand each other! You are on the same side! You need not fight.
raging moderate
Dec 2014
#32
Yes, controlling for class, whites on the whole are treated better than blacks.
DemocratSinceBirth
Dec 2014
#58
White privilege is real...I would never , ever dispute that but $$$$$ confers benefits...
DemocratSinceBirth
Dec 2014
#68
Disadvantaged by institutional racism would process a hell of a lot better without nearly the same
TheKentuckian
Dec 2014
#79