Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: How about we save the purity tests for blue states? [View all]MADem
(135,425 posts)25. But Landrieu was not a "conservative" Democrat. She was a liberal Democrat with
a bias favoring one of her state's Big Industries. That's the same bias anyone who runs in that state has--regardless of party.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
206 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
How about we don't. When anyone chooses to run as a Democratic party candidate why don't
Vincardog
Dec 2014
#1
You don't bring people around to the Democrats side all at once. People don't change their stripes
Dustlawyer
Dec 2014
#141
I can understand Pryor loosing, he never stood for anything that wasn't run by a focus group
LiberalArkie
Dec 2014
#124
How about we try running actual liberal Democrats with actual STRONG backing of the...
99Forever
Dec 2014
#3
It's never been done. So where are you getting this certainty from? We do know now
sabrina 1
Dec 2014
#86
Landrieu lost because she was painted as "running from Obama." You know, that right winger
MADem
Dec 2014
#93
Landrieu wasn't conservative, though. That's just a fact, no matter what a few people
MADem
Dec 2014
#149
She's pro-choice. Shes pro-equality. She voted for the ACA. She's pro equal pay for equal work.
MADem
Dec 2014
#156
Well, Warren sure tried it with Grimes in KY. It didn't get her over the top there, either.
MADem
Dec 2014
#158
But what you are saying is that you have your standards but that anyone else's are negotiable.
Bluenorthwest
Dec 2014
#19
OK, we're gonna play a numbers game, are we? And go back seven years to do it? "Ha ha ha?"
MADem
Dec 2014
#87
And she lost. do you think the democratic party should abandon those platforms, in order to win?
Scootaloo
Dec 2014
#75
Katrina was nine years ago, and Landrieu didn't lose in 2008. That thesis doesn't work
Scootaloo
Dec 2014
#114
Maybe it would have helped if some of the people trashing her would have gotten out the vote for her
MADem
Dec 2014
#159
The poster is responding to the suggestion that Landrieu is some kind of closet Dem wingnut.
MADem
Dec 2014
#98
You forget the events surrounding Arkansas sending only its second red Senator ever in 2010?
moriah
Dec 2014
#135
You used the phrase "they don't win". That implies always. You were wrong. nt
stevenleser
Dec 2014
#71
I was talking in the present tense. So I hate to break it to you but you are wrong.
pa28
Dec 2014
#97
Sounds to me it's the "Far Left or Die" Wing that has spoken. Screw you, south! We can do it
MADem
Dec 2014
#40
Howard Dean agrees with ME, too--the worst Dem is better than the best Republican!
MADem
Dec 2014
#113
"You" stayed home, and some of "you" took to the internet to shit all over her on election day.
MADem
Dec 2014
#174
Stayed home?? They never made it home--they're living in Houston and scattered to the four winds
MADem
Dec 2014
#41
Is that the democratic base that chose to make waffles instead of voting for the Democrat in LA?..nt
SidDithers
Dec 2014
#16
I think the right-wing efforts of trolling "from the left" have begun to pay off...
SidDithers
Dec 2014
#22
It's pretty obvious to me, too. The right wing is nothing if not relentless, and I think they've
MADem
Dec 2014
#44
Sad that more than a few here have succumbed to that not very sophisticated Jedi mind trick of a
stevenleser
Dec 2014
#47
The liberal policy positions that Landrieu held are gone now. You got nothing in their place...
SidDithers
Dec 2014
#84
You're the one arguing that we must run conservatives and liberalism has no chance.
Scootaloo
Dec 2014
#95
No, I'm the one arguing that staying home and making waffles instead of voting in a run-off election
SidDithers
Dec 2014
#101
"liberals don't win senate elections in states like Louisiana" - neither does Mary Landrieu
Scootaloo
Dec 2014
#18
and she lost this time. You insist liberals can't win, so we shouldn't bother
Scootaloo
Dec 2014
#51
I don't think liberals can win in Louisiana. It's tough even for conservative Dems.
DanTex
Dec 2014
#61
What liberal policies and positions do you advocate abandoning in order to "win"?
Scootaloo
Dec 2014
#68
There are few Southern Dems from that era who wouldn't be Repigs today.....
AverageJoe90
Dec 2014
#133
I'm suggesting that people in Louisiana, on average are more conservative than people in say
DanTex
Dec 2014
#29
Which goal that I listed would not sit well with regular folks in Louisiana? n/t
RufusTFirefly
Dec 2014
#37
They'd agree with the goals. But not the policies that you and I think will achieve those goals.
DanTex
Dec 2014
#38
No. How about we get dems that will actually fight for the dem positions and make the case for them
on point
Dec 2014
#28
I agree with the fighting, but I disagree that the Louisiana senate election is the right place for
DanTex
Dec 2014
#35
How do you know if we don't try? Apparently running a right winger as a democrat didn't work!
B Calm
Dec 2014
#43
Maybe if we run even FURTHER to the right, that will finally do the trick
RufusTFirefly
Dec 2014
#50
It worked 3 times before this. Like I said, without wins by her and other conservative Dems in 2008
DanTex
Dec 2014
#57
You mean like New Jersey, where many wonderful local democratic politicians supported Christie?
still_one
Dec 2014
#31
That we Democrats have a major problem, and it isn't just in the red states. When Lieberman a life
still_one
Dec 2014
#67
And what does that suggest to you? That California and Louisiana have very different voters. nt
stevenleser
Dec 2014
#54
Obviously it's not a 'duh' because you still don't get it. First of all, Landrieu won three times.
stevenleser
Dec 2014
#109
So with that type of logic the next Democratic Senator from Louisiana will have to be even more
B Calm
Dec 2014
#143
It suggests to me that we still have people believing Republicans,....
Spitfire of ATJ
Dec 2014
#105
They would tell you to hush up as they go to a fundraiser with Exxon/Mobil....
Spitfire of ATJ
Dec 2014
#146
I later on, after I posted, saw her comments, but she was far from the only one....
moriah
Dec 2014
#163
Keep in mind that ANY Dem that votes with a Republican is used for the "bipartisan" claim.
Spitfire of ATJ
Dec 2014
#164
Oh sure, I feel SO much better having Landrieu killing single payer than a Republican.
Spitfire of ATJ
Dec 2014
#186
Do you understand that the big battle to get it passed was fought Dem on Dem because of her type?
Spitfire of ATJ
Dec 2014
#189
Uh huh, sure. It was less of a battle to get Olympia Snow than it was to get Landrieu....
Spitfire of ATJ
Dec 2014
#201
The demographics in the South have changed. The old white racists are dying off...
Spitfire of ATJ
Dec 2014
#205
Landrieu's campaign was "you can hardly tell I'm a Dem!": no "purity test" hampered her
MisterP
Dec 2014
#94
What about the liberals in red states? Should the candidates ignore them?
Tierra_y_Libertad
Dec 2014
#118
I call BULLSHIT!! She won in 2008 on the back of Obama's popularity and high voter turnout for HIM
LynneSin
Dec 2014
#126
Running a a Republican Lite is a losing strategy, no matter what state you run for office
TerrapinFlyer
Dec 2014
#128
She's been shown the damn door--and her replacement makes her look like Bernie Sanders crossed with
MADem
Dec 2014
#139
We had a flawless liberal and progressive run for Governor in NJ in 2013
JustAnotherGen
Dec 2014
#165