General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: What could Landrieu have done to go further right? [View all]brooklynite
(96,882 posts)If so, we're talking about an event for which the funds go to the DSCC coffers, not for specific Senators. Incumbent Senators will be in attendance to draw a crowd and to be representational, but they don't have any special dibs on the money raised.
Let's consider the 2010 Specter/Sestak race. Specter WAS at the time the Incumbent Democrat, and likely attended some DSCC events (can't remember if I was invited to one). However, DSCC did nothing to block Sestak's efforts, and gave him full support when he got the nomination.
As for your lamentation that "non 1%ers" weren't able to participate; would it surprise you to know that many of the 1%ers there would be delighted to replace this system with publicly funded elections? It's been only a month since the election, and I've already been invited to two events for 2016 candidates. Honestly, I'd like to have the time off, and spend the money somewhere else. But unless you can figure out a way to amend the Constitution to change the system we have, most of us politically engaged funders won't be unilaterally disengaging.