General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: How about we save the purity tests for blue states? [View all]MADem
(135,425 posts)Unions like her. The NAACP likes her. Humane societies LOVE her. The NRA does NOT like her.
What more do you want? No "evidence" of being liberal? She comes from a heavily Catholic state that relies on the oil industry. They don't like that pot or any other drugs down there (though I'll bet they'll see the light when they see other states getting rich on the kind bud) and they aren't real "green" because that cuts into their oil bottom line. They like the death penalty down that way, too--it's what they do. They just aren't screaming progressives down that way. That's how people roll down there. They aren't going to "see the light" on those issues. They are local, cultural, ingrained. You gotta dance with the ones what brung you, after all.
I'd rather see her voting for the next Supreme Court justice than the nutcase who will be taking her seat in the Senate come January. And that's not "triangulating," that's being pragmatic.
You aren't going to elect anyone "more liberal" than Landrieu from that state, no matter how many earnest "All we have to do is CONVINCE them of the rightness of our vision" arguments that well meaning people (and some folks having a shitstirring laugh, I suspect) propose--it's just not going to happen. It's like expecting Vermont to elect a Klansman as their next governor. Some things just don't make sense, and a more liberal Senator from LA isn't going to happen until the demographics of that state change in a big, big way.