Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Questions about the reckless U.S. rescue attempt in Yemen [View all]HomerRamone
(1,112 posts)4. How could they have known that the terrorists might have high-tech equipment like barking guard dogs
http://www.moonofalabama.org/2014/12/a-reckless-us-rescue-attempt-kills-nearly-free-hostage.html
The psychological and emotional devastation to Yolande and her family will be compounded by the knowledge that Pierre was to be released by Al Qaeda tomorrow. A team of Abyan leaders met in Aden this morning and were preparing the final security and logistical arrangements, related to hostage release mechanisms, to bring Pierre to safety and freedom. It is even more tragic that the words we used in a conversation with Yolande at 5.59 this morning was "the wait is almost over". Three days ago we told her "Pierre will be home for Christmas". We certainly did not mean it in the manner it has unfolded. All logistical arrangements were in place to safely fly Pierre out of Yemen under diplomatic cover, then to meet with family members in a "safe" country, fly to South Africa, and directly to hospital for total medical evaluation and appropriate intervention.
If the U.S. knew that Pierre Korkie was about to be released the hostage rescue attempt was utterly reckless. Why not wait a day for him to be freed without any additional risks?
If the U.S. did not know that Pierre Korkie was to be released tomorrow this can only be called a major failure in intelligence and coordination.
If the U.S. knew that Pierre Korkie was about to be released the hostage rescue attempt was utterly reckless. Why not wait a day for him to be freed without any additional risks?
If the U.S. did not know that Pierre Korkie was to be released tomorrow this can only be called a major failure in intelligence and coordination.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
49 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
How could they have known that the terrorists might have high-tech equipment like barking guard dogs
HomerRamone
Dec 2014
#4
I find it amazing that anyone would believe AlQaeda's claims that they were going to release
msanthrope
Dec 2014
#8
I think it was, too. And I cannot imagine the suffering the hostage's families
msanthrope
Dec 2014
#22
They couldn't wait because they had reliable intel that the hostage would be killed Saturday morning
okaawhatever
Dec 2014
#13
The South African hostage is dead. He probably would have been free by now.
Comrade Grumpy
Dec 2014
#5
You are assuming a great deal here.....mainly that AQAP are truthtellers. That is an astonishing
msanthrope
Dec 2014
#9
Even if they didn't "know" for sure why not wait a day rather than do something so chancy? nt
HomerRamone
Dec 2014
#10
Posting a comment on an anonymous message board is not questioning authority. n/t
1StrongBlackMan
Dec 2014
#33
Again....why are accepting that AQAP's narrative of events is the truthful one?
msanthrope
Dec 2014
#14
Yes....they believed what AQAP told them. After 18 months of captivity, he was being released.
msanthrope
Dec 2014
#46
They'd been negotiating for 18 months. AQAP took the ransom money, and shot him anyway.nt
msanthrope
Dec 2014
#49
Clearly your source of information on this subject is promoting an agenda. Most reliable media
okaawhatever
Dec 2014
#15
He's not dead because of the rescue attempt, he's dead because AQAP shot him.
msanthrope
Dec 2014
#26
Actually, I find that your source does excuse terrorists. Your source seems to accept the
msanthrope
Dec 2014
#35
Yet they didn't shoot him for 18 months. He died because of the rescue attempt.
Comrade Grumpy
Dec 2014
#38
No....he died because AQAP kidnapped him and then killed him. If you served on
msanthrope
Dec 2014
#39
I think AQAP is directly culpable. I think the US is indirectly culpable. That's not so hard, is it?
Comrade Grumpy
Dec 2014
#43
Um...AQAP already had the ransom money. They shot him, anyway. So, tell me again
msanthrope
Dec 2014
#48
This blog is nothing but propaganda and conspiracy theory. You should be ashamed you posted it here
okaawhatever
Dec 2014
#18
And yet you didn't use the Guardian article for your post did you? No, you used a no-source CT
okaawhatever
Dec 2014
#45
But then, you're not the hostage who was about to be freed who got killed instead.
Comrade Grumpy
Dec 2014
#40