Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Questions about the reckless U.S. rescue attempt in Yemen [View all]HomerRamone
(1,112 posts)12. No nt
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
49 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
How could they have known that the terrorists might have high-tech equipment like barking guard dogs
HomerRamone
Dec 2014
#4
I find it amazing that anyone would believe AlQaeda's claims that they were going to release
msanthrope
Dec 2014
#8
I think it was, too. And I cannot imagine the suffering the hostage's families
msanthrope
Dec 2014
#22
They couldn't wait because they had reliable intel that the hostage would be killed Saturday morning
okaawhatever
Dec 2014
#13
The South African hostage is dead. He probably would have been free by now.
Comrade Grumpy
Dec 2014
#5
You are assuming a great deal here.....mainly that AQAP are truthtellers. That is an astonishing
msanthrope
Dec 2014
#9
Even if they didn't "know" for sure why not wait a day rather than do something so chancy? nt
HomerRamone
Dec 2014
#10
Posting a comment on an anonymous message board is not questioning authority. n/t
1StrongBlackMan
Dec 2014
#33
Again....why are accepting that AQAP's narrative of events is the truthful one?
msanthrope
Dec 2014
#14
Yes....they believed what AQAP told them. After 18 months of captivity, he was being released.
msanthrope
Dec 2014
#46
They'd been negotiating for 18 months. AQAP took the ransom money, and shot him anyway.nt
msanthrope
Dec 2014
#49
Clearly your source of information on this subject is promoting an agenda. Most reliable media
okaawhatever
Dec 2014
#15
He's not dead because of the rescue attempt, he's dead because AQAP shot him.
msanthrope
Dec 2014
#26
Actually, I find that your source does excuse terrorists. Your source seems to accept the
msanthrope
Dec 2014
#35
Yet they didn't shoot him for 18 months. He died because of the rescue attempt.
Comrade Grumpy
Dec 2014
#38
No....he died because AQAP kidnapped him and then killed him. If you served on
msanthrope
Dec 2014
#39
I think AQAP is directly culpable. I think the US is indirectly culpable. That's not so hard, is it?
Comrade Grumpy
Dec 2014
#43
Um...AQAP already had the ransom money. They shot him, anyway. So, tell me again
msanthrope
Dec 2014
#48
This blog is nothing but propaganda and conspiracy theory. You should be ashamed you posted it here
okaawhatever
Dec 2014
#18
And yet you didn't use the Guardian article for your post did you? No, you used a no-source CT
okaawhatever
Dec 2014
#45
But then, you're not the hostage who was about to be freed who got killed instead.
Comrade Grumpy
Dec 2014
#40