Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: OK..I'm pissed. Really pissed. If I hear one more person on this forum make this idiotic ,.. [View all]jeff47
(26,549 posts)32. Apparently I need to go find a definition of "imply" for you.
Let's quote your entire first entry:
I haven't seen anyone on this forum make those claims, could you provide a link please?
If not then YOU should offer an apology to all of DU for your false accusation.
If not then YOU should offer an apology to all of DU for your false accusation.
Did you actually say that no one on DU has ever said that? No. However, your demand for an apology prior to receiving any link means you were implying that no one on DU has ever said that.
Isn't digging into the basics of English grammar a fantastic way to spend an afternoon?!
I merely asked for some evidence to substantiate what I thought were some severe accusations.
Which would be true if we stop reading at the subject of your post. But your post has a body. Which means you did not merely ask for some evidence.
I don't think accusing any DU members of making idiotic, ridiculous, and illogical statements should go unchallenged. Do you?
DU membership does not have a "are you a decent human being" check. There are a massive quantity of idiotic, ridiculous, and illogical statements by enormous numbers of DU posters. Including long-term and/or well beloved DU members. Say, a lengthy curse-riddled post about "Obamacare" where Obama was specifically blamed for that poster's problem, when the problem 1)wasn't caused by Obama, and 2) "Obamacare" actually provided a solution.
The "YOU" from the OP was an in your face accusation and an invitation to confrontation. I saw that "YOU" as a personal challenge to everyone on DU.
Then I'd recommend actually reading the OP. The "you" referred to the next person who "on this forum make this idiotic, ridiculous, illogical statement" Everyone on DU is not making that statement, much less being the next one to do so.
In fact, the OP doesn't actually claim anyone on DU had already made that statement. Sure, it's implied by "next", but colloquially that is often used without a "first". Additionally, I'm reasonably confident that we've had at least one MIRT-ed out poster make that argument, since it's incredibly common elsewhere on the Internet.
Now, will you please provide a link to defend the OP?
Defend them from what? Are you going to "make this idiotic, ridiculous, illogical statement"?
Also, what's your excuse for calling the OP a liar before you had your link? In your mind, is it ok to attack individual DUers without evidence, but not the overall board?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
37 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
OK..I'm pissed. Really pissed. If I hear one more person on this forum make this idiotic ,.. [View all]
BlueJazz
Dec 2014
OP
Exactly. I've read 3 articles this morning (web and newspaper) where people smugly say..
BlueJazz
Dec 2014
#2
Why do cops get to choke someone into unconsciousness? What laws gives them that right?
Rex
Dec 2014
#7
I haven't seen anyone on this forum make those claims, could you provide a link please?
A Simple Game
Dec 2014
#11
Yes it was. This place is sick beyond all help. People SUPPORT BULLIES here and I'M SICK OF IT! nt
ChisolmTrailDem
Dec 2014
#21
No I don't have time to read every single post, thus the request for a link.
A Simple Game
Dec 2014
#23
I implied nothing, I stated that I hadn't seen anyone say what the accusations implied.
A Simple Game
Dec 2014
#29
You should be pissed. Rationalizing absurd levels of violence is absolutely fucked up.
Vattel
Dec 2014
#16
You got it. That's what put me in such an argumentative mood. Not because of people here..
BlueJazz
Dec 2014
#18
But no one on this forum made such a claim, ever. So (s)he should NOT be pissed
Doctor_J
Dec 2014
#37