Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

msanthrope

(37,549 posts)
14. Again....why are accepting that AQAP's narrative of events is the truthful one?
Mon Dec 8, 2014, 04:02 PM
Dec 2014

You assume that waiting a day would have been significant. But you base that assumption on what a terrorist organization told other people. AQAP's shakedown artists had been holding him for 18 months....negotiating and renegotiating.

I think it's horrible both hostages were murdered by AQAP.

AQAP threatened to kill Luke Somers Saturday...and I'm glad we tried to rescue him.

On Thursday, al-Qaida militants released a video showing Somers and threatening to kill him in three days if the United States did not meet the group's unspecified demands or if another rescue was attempted.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/12/06/hostages-killed-yemen_n_6280288.html

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Reckless? lamp_shade Dec 2014 #1
How could they have known that the terrorists might have high-tech equipment like barking guard dogs HomerRamone Dec 2014 #4
I find it amazing that anyone would believe AlQaeda's claims that they were going to release msanthrope Dec 2014 #8
I don't agree with the OP but al Qaeda has released many hostages. former9thward Dec 2014 #19
True...they have released some hostages for money. But would you believe msanthrope Dec 2014 #20
I think the rescue attempt was proper. former9thward Dec 2014 #21
I think it was, too. And I cannot imagine the suffering the hostage's families msanthrope Dec 2014 #22
They couldn't wait because they had reliable intel that the hostage would be killed Saturday morning okaawhatever Dec 2014 #13
They actually did know there was another hostage....just not who msanthrope Dec 2014 #16
Yes. Thanks for adding the link nt okaawhatever Dec 2014 #17
Reckless? The US has nothing to be sorry about...these homicidal maniacs msanthrope Dec 2014 #2
True. Lolita46 Dec 2014 #3
The South African hostage is dead. He probably would have been free by now. Comrade Grumpy Dec 2014 #5
Because you believe terrorists when they say they would have freed him? msanthrope Dec 2014 #6
As I quoted above, HomerRamone Dec 2014 #7
You are assuming a great deal here.....mainly that AQAP are truthtellers. That is an astonishing msanthrope Dec 2014 #9
Even if they didn't "know" for sure why not wait a day rather than do something so chancy? nt HomerRamone Dec 2014 #10
And if they had waited the day ... 1StrongBlackMan Dec 2014 #11
No nt HomerRamone Dec 2014 #12
That's the beauty of the internet ... 1StrongBlackMan Dec 2014 #23
Exactly...the armchair strategists don't have consequences. nt msanthrope Dec 2014 #28
Sadly, this is a popular sport here ... 1StrongBlackMan Dec 2014 #30
so don't question authority nt HomerRamone Dec 2014 #31
Posting a comment on an anonymous message board is not questioning authority. n/t 1StrongBlackMan Dec 2014 #33
So I'm not raising questions and trying to get people to think about HomerRamone Dec 2014 #34
LOL ... Okay. n/t 1StrongBlackMan Dec 2014 #36
Again....why are accepting that AQAP's narrative of events is the truthful one? msanthrope Dec 2014 #14
His family and his organization believed he was morningfog Dec 2014 #44
Yes....they believed what AQAP told them. After 18 months of captivity, he was being released. msanthrope Dec 2014 #46
Well his wife had been released. And I've not read morningfog Dec 2014 #47
They'd been negotiating for 18 months. AQAP took the ransom money, and shot him anyway.nt msanthrope Dec 2014 #49
Clearly your source of information on this subject is promoting an agenda. Most reliable media okaawhatever Dec 2014 #15
AQAP had already negotiated the release of his wife. Comrade Grumpy Dec 2014 #25
He's not dead because of the rescue attempt, he's dead because AQAP shot him. msanthrope Dec 2014 #26
Nobody is "excusing" the terrorists HomerRamone Dec 2014 #32
Actually, I find that your source does excuse terrorists. Your source seems to accept the msanthrope Dec 2014 #35
Yet they didn't shoot him for 18 months. He died because of the rescue attempt. Comrade Grumpy Dec 2014 #38
No....he died because AQAP kidnapped him and then killed him. If you served on msanthrope Dec 2014 #39
I think AQAP is directly culpable. I think the US is indirectly culpable. That's not so hard, is it? Comrade Grumpy Dec 2014 #43
Um...AQAP already had the ransom money. They shot him, anyway. So, tell me again msanthrope Dec 2014 #48
This blog is nothing but propaganda and conspiracy theory. You should be ashamed you posted it here okaawhatever Dec 2014 #18
Are you better than the Guardian? HomerRamone Dec 2014 #24
He might have been alive but for the fact that AQAP shot him. msanthrope Dec 2014 #27
+100 nt okaawhatever Dec 2014 #41
And yet you didn't use the Guardian article for your post did you? No, you used a no-source CT okaawhatever Dec 2014 #45
Reckless? Blue_Tires Dec 2014 #29
i find it pretty ballsy....reckless?...ummmm NO. spanone Dec 2014 #37
But then, you're not the hostage who was about to be freed who got killed instead. Comrade Grumpy Dec 2014 #40
no i'm not, i'm still alive. but i don't find it reckless. spanone Dec 2014 #42
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Questions about the reckl...»Reply #14